伟大的安巴逊

HD中字

主演:约瑟夫·科顿,提姆·霍尔特,多洛雷斯·卡斯特洛,安妮·巴克斯特,阿格妮丝·摩尔海德

类型:电影地区:美国语言:英语年份:1942

欢迎安装高清版[一起看]电影APP

 量子

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 无尽

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 红牛

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 非凡

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 剧照

伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.1伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.2伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.3伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.4伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.5伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.6伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.13伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.14伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.15伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.16伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.17伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.18伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.19伟大的安巴逊 剧照 NO.20

 剧情介绍

伟大的安巴逊电影免费高清在线观看全集。
  20世纪初,Amberson家族在当地是一个名门望族。年轻人Eugene Morgan(约瑟夫·科顿 Joseph Cotten 饰)苦苦追求Amberson家的Isabel(多洛雷斯·卡斯特洛 Dolores Costello 饰)无果,Isabel最终嫁给了Wilbur Minafer(Donald Dillaway 饰演),两人生下儿子George(提姆·霍尔特 Tim Holt 饰)。George在父母的溺爱下长大,从小就是个骄横的孩子,长大后更是变本加厉。从大学回家的George遇到了来他们家做客的Eugene Morgan,此时的Morgan已是一个在研究动力车的人,他的妻子去世,留给他一个女儿Lucy(安妮·巴克斯特 Anne Baxter)。George爱上了Lucy,而George的姑姑似乎也对Morgan青睐有加。不久George的父亲去世了,George开始在Amberson家族里当家做主。他听闻了Morgan和他母亲的一些传闻,严厉阻止了其发展,并带着他的母亲去欧洲旅游。而Morgan的汽车研究正在不断壮大,却遭到了George的轻视。无视社会发展的George正在随着Amberson家族的没落而渐渐失去了他原有的一切......  本片根据Booth Tarkington于1918年出版的同名小说改编,提名奥斯卡最佳女配角和最佳影片等奖项。机界战队全开者(粤语版)女哭声八月未央杀手1987山炮贼中贼 (2016)四大名捕斗将军条子骇客(国语版)恐龙特急克塞号海洋王国莫斯科2017通灵之战 第十七季西游降魔篇美男与野兽芳香之城传奇偷渡者那狗那猫美丽誓言该吃药了:赞安诺呼叫助产士 第十三季明日1995彻夜狂欢废柴小仵作囧探双雄上帝之鸟浮云心动1986粤语武神赵子龙温柔时刻夺命枪王雪人情缘胜利时刻:湖人王朝崛起 第一季骑士陨落第一季变异编年史远方2017山2红石杀手柏拉图关系 第一季洛奇无性的世界每天都在征服生活济公之神龙再现粤语流氓警察分裂 2017语义错误帝企鹅日记

 长篇影评

 1 ) The Magnificent Ambersons FAQ

http://ambersons.com/FAQs.htm

What is The Magnificent Ambersons about?

The Magnificent Ambersons is about the proud and celebrated Amberson family. The story shows how the family refuses to change with the times, and the subsequent deterioration of the Amberson name as a result.

The story is set in Indianapolis in the late 1800's/early 1900's, and shows how the beauty of a small town was slowly destroyed by the advent of the automobile. A number of dramas carry the movie along. Isabel Amberson is the town beauty and is courted by various beaus, one of whom is the brash and handsome Eugene Morgan. Eugene plans an elaborate serenade for Isabel in front of the Amberson mansion, but makes a fool of himself by falling on his bass viol in a drunken stupor. Eugene tries repeatedly to win Isabel, but she refuses. Even though she is in love with Eugene, the embarrassment from this one incident and the social customs of the time prohibit her from having anything to do with him. Isabel eventually marries Wilbur Minafer, who is less flashy than Eugene, but respectable. Isabel isn't in love with Wilbur, however, and their one child George is incredibly spoiled by Isabel and grows up to be extremely arrogant, righteous and self-absorbed. George has an air of entitlement because he is an Amberson, and has no use for anyone who wants to work for a living. This includes Isabel's true love, Eugene, who left town after losing Isabel. Eugene returns twenty years later with his daughter Lucy, having made his fortune by developing one of the first automobiles. After Wilbur's death, Eugene pursues Isabel again. Wilbur's sister Fanny is also in love with Eugene, though this is not returned by Eugene. Even though Isabel and Eugene are both still in love, their plans are thwarted by George. George hates Eugene not just because of his profession, but because he has to share his mother's attention for the first time. When George learns that the townspeople are talking about Eugene's love for Isabel, George becomes enraged by this supposed scandal and does whatever he can to prevent Isabel and Eugene from marrying. George and Isabel leave on a trip around the world and are gone for five years. Despite Isabel's poor health and longing for Eugene, George insists that they both stay abroad, returning only when Isabel is colse to death. George's attitudes and actions help to ruin his family, as well as his chances of having a relationship with Eugene's daughter Lucy. Eventually George receives his "comeuppance", learning humility after suffering the tragic consequences of his own devices. George reconciles with Lucy, and asks for Eugene's forgiveness. By then all of the members of the Amberson family have either died, moved away or become destitute.

Is this movie based on a book?

Yes. The book The Magnificent Ambersons was written by Booth Tarkington, for which he received the Pulitzer Prize in 1919.

When was this movie made and who directed it?

The movie was released in July 1942 and was directed by Orson Welles. It was his next project after right after Citizen Kane.

I've heard of Citizen Kane, but not The Magnificent Ambersons. Why?

The Magnificent Ambersons was supposed to be as big as if not bigger than Citizen Kane, but many events contributed to this classic becoming an obscure Hollywood memory (see next FAQ). The short explanation is that Ambersons is an artistic film that was not well received by mainstream audiences when it was released, and it just never caught on the same way that other classics do.

What happened to this movie to make it such a tragic piece of Hollywood history?

In its original form Ambersons was 131 minutes long, and was very upbeat for about 45 minutes, afterwhich it took a sudden dramatic turn to become a very sad story without an uplifting ending. Once most of Ambersons was finished, Welles left for Brazil by request of the US State Department to make another film, which was intended to foster relations between the the US and South America (the film was never finished, but would later be released as "It's All True"). The final process of editing was left to the film's editor Robert Wise. There are conflicting reports of what happened next, but a number of scenes were cut, ordered either by RKO or by Welles himself. Either way, the shortened version was previewed at a theater in Pomona, CA, so that audience reaction could be used to make changes if necessary.

The Pomona preview was a disaster. Before Ambersons played, the audience had watched the rousing musical The Fleet's In, so the audience was probably not in the mood for a slow-paced and depressing period piece. Audience members (consisting mostly of teenagers) talked at the picture, kidded it, and laughed at the wrong places. After the film, audience members filled out "comment cards" to express their opinions. While some of the responses praised the film, most of the cards were very negative, with comments like "it stinks", "rubbish", and "a horrible distorted dream". The president of RKO, George Schaefer, was at the preview and wrote to Welles "Never in all my experience in the industry have I taken so much punishment or suffered as I did at the Pomona preview".

At this point RKO had invested over $1,000,000 in a picture that could possibly bomb. The next action was to make more changes and preview it again. Again, there are two different versions of what happened - either some of the original cuts were put back in, or more cuts were made. Either way, another preview was held two days later in Pasadena. This preview was much more favourable, although both audiences had problems with some of the same aspects. The film at this point, while shorter (about 117 minutes), was still relatively intact. Rather than leaving the film alone, however, RKO believed that Ambersons would only appeal to a more mature audience, which was how Pasadena was perceived. Because the largest part of movie revenue would came from the younger crowd, substantial changes would have to be made to make the film shorter and more upbeat. Ideally, Welles would have to be present during this editing process, but since Welles was in South America (and working on another movie), he could only communicate changes by telegram. Attempts to send Robert Wise to Brazil were prevented due to wartime travel restrictions. Correspondence from RKO with detailed changes were sent to Welles, and Welles in return made his own attempts to make changes, to no avail (see below).

It wasn't long before RKO took Ambersons away from Welles completely. Input from a number of studio executives was given to try and save the picture. One in particular that is somewhat amusing was from producer Bryan Foy, who said that the film was "too f*ckin' long", and that forty minutes had to be cut ("just throw all the footage up in the air and grab everything but forty minutes"). Eventually, about 50 minutes was cut from original Ambersons, and some scenes were written and shot by others, all in Welles' absence. Many of the cuts were made to eliminate the more depressing aspects of the film, like how Major Amberson and Fanny had lost their money in bad investments. In addition, the original sad ending was cut and reshot to be more uplifting. The final version, running at about 88 minutes, was released in July to so-so results, and was effectively abandoned by RKO. The film lost over $600,000, an enormous amount for a relatively small studio like RKO.

What happened to Orson Welles as a result of the Ambersons?

Welles was recalled from South America before the filming of "It's All True" was finished and his contract with RKO was terminated. Because of the problems with Ambersons, and the fact that the South American project was scrapped by the new authorities at RKO, Welles developed a reputation for not finishing projects. He was never entrusted with a major Hollywood production again. In Welles own words, "They destroyed Ambersons and it destroyed me." Welles did go on to direct and star in many more pictures, but without the luxuries that he enjoyed at RKO. Welles spent much of his career acting (sometimes in roles that were quite beneath his talent) so that he could raise money to fund his own projects. His next major project as director was Touch of Evil, which was also severely cut prior to release (fortunately, this movie was recently restored).

How did Welles try to save Ambersons during the editing process while he was in South America?

From the time Welles arrived in Rio de Janeiro he was in constant contact with several poeple at RKO. Communication was mostly by telegram, between February and June 1942, with memos between Welles and various people at RKO, including Robert Wise, Jack Moss, Joseph Cotten, and George Schaefer. It's clear from these memos how much of an effect the Pomona preview had on RKO. Welles made several suggestions to try and make Ambersons work, even though he was fully occupied with filming in Rio. Despite his attempts, Welles was to have little influence over the editing process.

Lawrence French, a fellow Ambersons fan, has compiled many of these memos. You can see them here, along with many images from the film. One can only imagine Welles' anger and frustration, knowing what was being done to his work in his absence, not to mention the fact that his standing in Hollywood was now in serious danger.

What are some of the unique aspects of this film that make it (or made it) so special?

Welles definitely wanted to transcend the traditional Hollywood movie, both with Citizen Kane and Ambersons. Welles used a variety of film techniques to achieve his goal. Deep-focus photography, overlapping dialogue, long takes, expressionistic lighting - all were used to make Ambersons a work of art.

1. The Ambersons mansion. This was one of the most elaborate and expensive sets ever built at the time. Incredibly detailed and elegant, it was probably the first movie of its time to give the illusion of being in an actual mansion, allowing multiple rooms and areas to be captured in a single scene.

2. The ballroom sequence. When George returns home for Christmas holiday after his sophomore year at Harvard, his family held a ball in his honour ("the last of the great, long-remembered dances that everybody talked about"). One sequence, which was largely cut from the original, was a continuous series of backward-moving camera shots through four rooms, following different characters as they made their way through the ballroom in the Amberson mansion. Long, continuous shots like this are very unusual, particularly because the large, bulky camera is moving backwards along a circular course. Welles liked long takes, and other long takes are in the film, such as the scene with Fanny, George and Uncle Jack in the Amberson kitchen.

3. The sleighride. The morning after the ball, most of the Ambersons go out for a ride in Eugene's horseless carriage. The sleighride is one of the most unique sequences in film, and fortunately this scene was left relatively intact (see below). To make this scene as realistic as possible, a soundstage was set up in an icehouse called the Union Ice Company, which was in downtown Los Angeles. This icehouse allowed a more authentic recreation of an outdoor winter scene, with real snow and visible breath from the actors. The quality of the dialogue recorded at the icehouse wasn't suitable, however, so the actors re-recorded their lines on the RKO roof, sitting on planks that were being rocked up and down. This simulated the bouncing motion of Eugene's automobile, so that the vibration of their voices could be picked up. While the result is truly exceptional, the filming was technically demanding and put the film behind schedule. As well, Ray Collins, who played Uncle Jack Amberson, contracted pneumonia and was out for ten days.

4. Major Amberson's speech. Shortly after Isabel's death, Major Amberson sits alone in front of a fire and ponders the origins of life. This is often cited as one of the most beautiful scenes in the film. While Welles narrates, the light from the flickering fire illuminates the Major's bemused face, while he struggles to understand what life is about. The scene fades away, and there is no further mention of the Major, and the assumption is that he has died. In the original version, the Major continues to wonder aloud. George asks him if he wants a glass of water. The Major responds "No -- no, I-I don't want anything at all. I wish somebody could tell me..." The scene then dissolves to two tombstones, Isabel's and the Major's. This obviously would have been much more powerful and less confusing than the edited version, and presumably was cut because it came shortly after Isabel's death and increased the sadness of the film.

So, if this is such a great movie, why did it bomb?

Welles blamed the failure of Ambersons on RKO, since they were responsible for cutting so much of the film. However, it seems just as possible that Ambersons was just not that interesting to a general audience. Understandably, audiences in WWII America were more interested in musicals, comedies and patriotic fare than they were in some depressing period drama. If the original version existed, it would likely be hailed today as a masterpiece, much the same as Citizen Kane. And Ambersons didn't entirely bomb, since it was nominated for 4 Academy Awards including best picture. As well, Agnes Moorehead won the New York Film Critic's award for her role as Aunt Fanny.

Has anyone ever found the missing Ambersons footage?

No. The cut footage was kept in film vaults for a few months, and was eventually burned due to a shortage of storage space. There are lots of stills from the cut footage, and the movie trailer (which is on the VHS tape from Turner Classic Movies) has a few seconds of film that isn't in the movie.

The January 2002 issue of Vanity Fair magazine has a great article on Ambersons, including interviews with several people who have tried unsuccessfully to find the original version, both in the US and South America. Although no one can say for sure that the missing footage no longer exists, the take-home message of the article is that it's gone for good.

What was the original ending to the Ambersons?

In the original ending, after Eugene hears that George is in the hospital after being hit by an automobile, Eugene goes to visit Fanny in the cheap boardinghouse where she and George now live. Eugene is rich and successful, and Fanny now lives in poverty, having once enjoyed the luxury of the Amberson mansion. Eugene seems completely oblivious to Fanny's plight, and instead tells Fanny about his visit to see George in the hospital, and how George asked for his forgiveness, and that Lucy believes that she and George will get married. During this time Fanny is seated and rocking back and forth in squeaky rocking chair, while a silly vaudeville record plays in the background, and a variety of old maids play cards and listen in curiously. While Eugene talks, Fanny responds unemotionally. There is nothing between them anymore, and she has given up on the possibility that Eugene may finally show some romantic interest in her. Eugene finally adds that he could sense Isabel's presence in the hospital room, and that through him she had brought George under shelter again, and that he had been true at last to his true love. Eugene then says goodbye, leaves and the movie ends.

While there is some closure in this ending, the lingering effect is that of the destitute and lonely Fanny. Welles believed this to be the best scene in the movie, and said that it was about "the deterioration of personality, the way people diminish with age, and particularly with impecunious old age". This was the final reminder of the end of the great Amberson era.

The original ending was reshot and shows Eugene and Fanny at the hospital. Eugene's dialogue is about the same, but after Eugene tells Fanny about Isabel's presence in the room, Fanny beams with joy and she and Eugene walk away, accompanied by a great swell of happy music. Everyone is going to be OK.

What was the Mercury Theatre?

The Mercury Theatre was a theatrical producing company formed in 1937 by Orson Welles and John Houseman. By then Welles was already an accomplished radio personality, with his intense dramatic sensibilities and mellifluous voice. The Mercury employed many personalities who would work with Welles in film, including Agnes Moorehead, Ray Collins, Joseph Cotten, and Bernard Herrmann. In 1938 the Mercury produced a radio series called Mercury Theatre on the Air, which dramatized great novels (including Ambersons) and Shakespearean plays. The series was most famous for their 1938 radio broadcast of H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds. Because of the considerable attention and notoriety that Welles received from this broadcast, the Mercury Theatre on the Air became The Campbell Playhouse (after being sponsored by the Campbell's Soup Company). In 1939 Welles and Houseman signed a contract with RKO, and The Mercury Theatre soon moved to Hollywood to make Citizen Kane and The Magnificent Ambersons.

Is Ambersons available on video or DVD?

There have been several VHS releases of Ambersons (same movie, different distributor). Some of these are available on amazon.com. After years of waiting, the Region 1 (North American) Ambersons DVD is finally available, but only as part of the Citizen Kane 70th Anniversary Collectors Edition Blu-ray set. At this point this set is available exclusively on amazon.com. There are several Region 2 DVD releases - French, Japanese, German, British, and Spanish. The German DVD (Der Glanz des Hauses Amberson) is available from Kinowelt Home Entertainment. I can't attest to the quality of this DVD, although the website dvdscan.com gave it a poor review. The French DVD comes with some extras, including excerpts from This is Orson Welles, and a booklet with Ambersons information, all in a large collectible box. This DVD is available from amazon.fr. The best version of Ambersons that I've seen is the Criterion laserdisc, which also comes with a wealth of extras. The laserdisc is out of print but is frequently for sale on eBay. For more information on Ambersons video availability, as well as a comparison of the French and Japanese DVDs, go to Wellesnet.com, a great Orson Welles resource.

Where can I read more about the Ambersons?

The most complete reference is Robert L. Carringer's book The Magnificent Ambersons - A Reconstruction. This book describes the history of the making and undoing of the Ambersons. This is also the only book that has all of the dialogue from the original 131 minute version of the Ambersons, as well as various storyboards, sketches, stills from the lost footage, and the complicated details of the editing process and Welles futile attempts to influence it from South America. Even with just the script, the intense sadness of the original ending with Fanny and Eugene in the boarding house is heartbreaking. Another book by the same author is The Making of Citizen Kane, which has a short but detailed chapter on Ambersons.

Another terrific reference is This Is Orson Welles by Orson Welles and Peter Bogdonavich. This book has a condensed version of the original script, as well as excellent conversations between Welles and Bogdonavich about Ambersons. This is also a great book for anyone who wants to know more about Welles' other movies and his life after Ambersons.

BFI Film Classics The Magnificent Ambersons by V.F. Perkins. This book also has a description and analysis of the Ambersons, much like the Carringer book but without the script.

 

 2 ) 【译】标准收藏公司评《伟大的安巴逊》

【本文首发于《虹膜》公众号】

原标题:Loving the Ruins; or, DoesThe Magnificent AmbersonsExist?

作者:Jonathan Lethem

译者:覃天

校对:易二三

来源:《标准收藏》(2018年11月26日)

「加一减一等于零,所以你的意思是说我并无特点吗?」——伊莎贝尔

「我确确实实记得你。」——乔治

「乔治,原来在之前的生活里,你从来没有认识过我。」——尤金

上世纪80年代初的某个夜晚,影评人保罗·尼尔森为《伟大的安巴逊》录制了一个解说视频,在深夜的电视节目中向观众介绍了这部影片。我被荧幕上的影像深深地吸引了。这到底是怎么回事?我的朋友沉迷于那些长期以来被观众忽视的、受损的电影。他推荐我去看未经剪辑、更长版本影片,例如霍华德·霍克斯的《红河》和《烽火弥天》;坚持让我理解迈克尔·西米诺的《天堂之门》是荒谬的,这种共识本身就是荒谬的;执意让我看那些弗里茨·朗还未修复的《人之欲》和《蓝色栀子》。在保罗·尼尔森看来,奥逊·威尔斯是最神圣的一位电影人,然而彼时嘈杂的电影环境却影响着他的崇敬之情,电视里上演的是屠杀、主人公受挫和抢劫故事,而奥逊·威尔斯却创造出了一个独特的梦境。

最终,我们通过录像带回溯了威尔斯那些熠熠生辉的作品——《阿卡丁先生》《历劫佳人》《一切皆真》(暂译,It’s All True)《麦克白》和《不朽故事》,通过修复,它们的魅力被重新展现在观众面前。(当我在写这篇文章的时候,奥逊·威尔斯的遗作《风的另一边》经过修复后,即将上映。)在众多作品中,只有《伟大的安巴逊》——也许是威尔斯最伟大的一部作品——像一座黑暗中的高楼,从未被修复过。

《伟大的安巴逊》的主题为何会在观众心中激起如此深刻的苦楚?重看此片不仅是为了目睹其精巧结构的步步坍塌,它也反映了安巴逊家族可笑的神话及其脆弱面,他们追求的美国梦不过是一个幻象。世间残留美好的事物注定会被秃鹰叼走,而这些「秃鹰」可能就是我们自己。观看影片的过程也就成为了观众幻想过去的一种途径。开头主角提到,现在已经开始时兴「没有马的马车」——现代化的汽车,这么一看,安巴逊家族在昔日辉煌世界中的所谓贵族地位,难道不可悲吗?商业化带来的平等主义不也意味着要把他们扫入时代的故纸堆里吗?我们想从这样一个悲凉的故事中看到什么呢?正如尤金所说:「逝去的并不是一个年迈的时代,而是一个早已死去的时代。没有任何时代,只有新的时代。」

《伟大的安巴逊》既身处在一个死去的时代,又似乎从中抽离。中断剧情的场景变得越来越多,直到它们显得有些失真。制片厂最终还是替换了不少影片中的场景,似乎是为了稳定电影的美学基调。在好莱坞电影中,我们每次都看着一个活生生的人变成鬼魂;我们看着鬼魂穿过豪宅的各个房间,走向一扇打开的窗户;我们以为至少可以看到鬼魂离开房间,并哀悼它的无形。但是并没有,观众总是看到一半就能猜到结局,太快了,以至于让人无法接受;鬼魂们甚至还没走到窗前就已经消失了。但《伟大的安巴逊》却并非如此,它的独特性让它区别于那些固化的古典好莱坞作品。

好莱坞电影浮华的「废墟」永远吸引着人们的目光。《伟大的安巴逊》的前九分钟似乎都在为这幅古典绘画勾勒线条,其中充满了诱人、尖酸刻薄的叙述,以及群像的表演(这得益于阿格妮丝·摩尔海德、约瑟夫·科顿以及理查德·本内特等人的演绎)。所有这些似乎都是对美国社会光辉过去的一种回望。在第九分钟的时候,随着安倍逊家族大门的打开,一阵寒风吹过,我们发现自己陷入了更深、更不安的困境。旁白消失了,一场「伟大的、记忆中的舞蹈」缓缓展开。我们跟随着奥逊·威尔斯的摄影机,沉浸在自己的感知中,被层层对话所迷惑。威尔斯似乎就在我们耳边轻声说道:「你想和我一起回到过去吗?」我们不仅进入到了一个过去的世界,还开始了一次对美国黄金时代集体心理学的研究。我们徜徉在威尔斯的叙述中,既失忆又怀旧。

影片中伟大的舞厅场景(被中间的几分钟打断,但不是致命的)通过讽刺性的旋律层层递进,直到它的节奏逐渐加强,我们和角色一起登上楼梯,进入不断升级的黑暗氛围中。我们现在陷入了乔治愚蠢的行为中,每当范妮的狂躁症发作,她就会尖叫。她的神经质,在这一幕和之后奶油蛋糕的场景中,甚至包括之后的美国影片中,都前所未有的。(当然,《公民凯恩》中的一切也没有让观众做好准备。)多年后约翰·卡萨维茨的《面孔》中才出现了这样的角色。

通过反复观看影片,我们知道乔治和芬妮是影片的主要人物。这是一个依靠着「享有特权的弱者」的报复行为所驱动的世界。影片的象征性显得有些无情,即使这些人物在努力挽回他们对环境的洞察力:在晚餐聚会的争论中,尤金悄悄地把他的愤怒发泄在画面底端的汤勺上,同时平静地承认,汽车的发明可能是人类文明的一场灾难。还有哪位导演能像奥逊·威尔斯一样在《伟大的安巴逊》中那样对这些角色又爱又恨?他像库布里克一样「摧毁」着他们,又像让·雷诺阿一样崇拜他们。

《伟大的安巴逊》让我们无处安身。我们无法怀念这种等级森严、趾高气扬、自封的贵族制度,也不能忍受现代化的生活对过往生活的摧毁。我们和乔治以及范妮分享着相同的心境。尤其是范妮,这个被生活压垮的「怪物」。她无法得到尤金,沉浸在自己的过去。然而,她也无法忍受自己破坏了尤金和伊莎贝尔的关系,她让乔治和自己一起,把假正经和偏执的愤怒作为武器对付其他人。难怪《伟大的安巴逊》在洛杉矶举行试映会时,许多观众忍受不了这部作品。我想完整、修复过的《伟大的安巴逊》可能会「毁」了我们所有人。

文章来源://www.criterion.com/current/posts/6065-loving-the-ruins-or-does-the-magnificent-ambersons-exist

 3 ) 幽灵

8.0

为纪念影片问世八十周年,导演剪辑版有机会被找回并进行公映,如果有机会,非常希望能一睹全貌。古典乐与民谣不同,后者回应了现实,但前者是超脱的,它脱离此时间,脱离此空间,或其他条件,不能被具体地概括,厚重感又有别于通俗音乐;哪怕这个作品问世在制片公司干涉后,我仍认为它是完美的,只不过它努力的方向与这些美国类型片相反,是《去年在马里昂巴德》那样的作品,而脉络还要更清晰。我也不知道该如何描述这部影片,要么过于细碎,显得我抓不住重彩之处,要么过于宏大,显得我看不出重彩之处。这个故事里无数角色登场,但起点只一个,就是乔治·安巴逊。无论约瑟夫·科顿所饰演的尤金·摩根凛然的面孔多么抢戏,这仍是乔治·安巴逊的故事,是一个富有者失去所有财产的故事,他就是殷商的帝辛。你看,这就是过于宏大的同时过于细碎,什么都没讲。

《伟大的安巴逊》中场面调度是花哨而惹眼的,但最妙的一点是这并没让我们出戏,而是对于米德兰镇越陷越深。一个人身处这所过时的城市,与时代领跑者们生活截然相反,并自以为是地误认为自身是万物的尺度、这就是世界的全貌,直到尤金·摩根现身——而你从没见过这样精炼的妙语,“因为我们走得越快,花的时间就越少”。这是奥逊·威尔斯对所谓“乔治·安巴逊”的追忆,而后者甚至只是符号,于是我们看到了许多与那些常见类型电影信仰不同的地方,幽灵般的主观镜头不知所踪,再对那些难以察觉的表情不厌其烦地进行特写,还有英国观众最讨厌的,强迫人们注视空空如也的环境,第三人称的叙述中掺杂着剧中人对镜自语的补充,而这些信息与情节发展无关,他只是事无巨细地描述现在正流行什么样的靴子。

如果这是另一部“Once upon a time”,它可以设计得足够悲恸,但电影没有,反而选择了不断制造间离感。奥逊·威尔斯可以把乔治塑造成另一个公民凯恩,但他也没有;在这样交替的时代下,当尤金闯入他们的摇篮时,每个人的内心世界一定都深邃无比,但他也拒绝继续探索。乔治·安巴逊的身上没有悬念,他的核心动作是要阻止母亲与尤金·摩根再婚,以一种充满自毁倾向的决然和觉悟,靠拒绝尤金和母亲选择的自由来守护一种极为抽象的家族尊严;但在电影里,过去了就是过去了,结束了就是结束了。他只有浅浅一层,正如整个米德兰的空间,宴厅、庭院、街道,是那些变化的议题,交通、工业、房产、婚姻,城市自己急速膨胀,玷污了它自己,而人类在这一切的衬托下并不更凸显。是建筑,开始时安巴逊的家族庄园是稳定的,静止的,长镜头的,而在结束时乔治·安巴逊重新望着的陌生米德兰城市是流动的,变化的,蒙太奇的,这就是马车变成汽车的意义。这是一个表面的世界,人类并不处于任何深层次,他们也活在表面。乔治·安巴逊不会被家族制伏、不会被教会制伏,他那毫无理智可言的自尊是被周围变化的一切消解的。对了,这部显然要比《公民凯恩》好许多,不那么方便大众,是一则反溯家族记忆的私密创作。各位,这可比我们“公认影史最佳”的《公民凯恩》还要好许多许多。

乔治和露西让我甚至想到了瓦力和伊娃,代表未来的女性与坚守过去的男性相爱的悲剧,只是因为后者毫无必要的坚持,而影片想要追忆的是就是这种徒劳感,同情他的傲慢。过去已经消失了,我们才意识到这一切应当被展现,像常听的韩国饶舌歌词里说的“我是用hiphop来保卫我的国土”,以前我并不理解,现在呢,至少意识到了“我是用影像来保卫自己的国土”这种象征意义了,同学会挥魔杖般,学着认识到我们最熟悉的周围有朝一日会变得完全陌生。这个故事里无数角色登场,但起点只一个,就是乔治·安巴逊,这个故事的意义是保有乔治·安巴逊·米纳弗的存在痕迹。尤金·摩根充满自信的演讲道,根本不存在所谓旧时光,过去的时光不是变旧了,不是老去了,而是死了,只有未来是活着的。无论约瑟夫·科顿凛然的面孔多么抢戏,他出现在最开端,出现在最结尾,这仍是乔治·安巴逊·米纳弗的故事。不对,出现在最开端和最结尾的是奥逊威尔斯,是他在慢慢地说出“安巴逊家族的辉煌始于1873年,这份辉煌持续到米德兰变成一座现代城市为止”和“女士们,先生们,伟大的安巴逊改编自布什·塔金顿的小说”,截删得格外抽象,伴随着这些东西,那些凌乱的剪接我们以前叫它“蒙太奇”,现在叫“短视频”,不对吗?以前的人死了,现在的人忘了,水消失在水中。这就是过于宏大的同时过于细碎,什么都没讲,什么都是,我写得可太烂了。

 4 ) 旋转-水晶球

德勒兹说:“完美无瑕的水晶球的理想状态”“人们只能在水晶球中旋转”。

威尔斯就是完成这个水晶球最笨拙的那一个导演。镜头倾斜了,画面自由了,人物滑下去了,影像振荡了,结束了。

这是威尔斯的水晶球时刻。

雷诺阿也是,french cancan太用劲,但是即使那么用劲也没有打破球体,球体里的那个运动在哪里?我认为它在妮妮沿着楼梯杆滑下去的那条路径中,这通向红磨坊的第一场舞会。

德勒兹说:而以后影片中的其他法兰多拉舞,人们不应该认为它们是其他的,而应该认为它们永远是“那支”法兰多拉舞。

所以妮妮她只能像舞台表演一般,在最伤心的时刻选择走向舞台的一角,背靠着柱子一点一点滑下去。她在表演,在表演既定程序,水晶球里的环节正走到这一步。

还有谁?塔蒂是很温柔的水晶球手工者,巴赞说他结成结晶。晶体,可不可以称呼它为水晶球?对于于洛先生没有“剧情”可言,我们何尝见过真实的有剧情的水晶球。所以当影片结束,淡淡的伤感几乎不可能是影片本身散出来的,因为我们看到水晶球里的重复,我们开心后伤感。

因为塔蒂将他的世界“同质化”,声音在重复,反应在连锁。

接着是布列松,布列松的水晶球时刻是穆谢特碰碰车的撞车瞬间。水晶球里在下雪而外界不,穆谢特的心,穆谢特在高潮而我们不。

布列松多么会安排啊,开头连猎人的全貌都不让观众知道。撞车是球体瞬间,在这个瞬间我们知道我们置身于水晶球中,开头的猎人就是进入球体的序章。

加藤泰一些红牡丹赌徒,有一部形成了球体,就是《花牌胜负》,阿龙花冈在雪中打伞,他们最后的运动就终止在那里,然后重复。这和穆谢特太像了,但是花冈活了过来,或者说他一次次复活,因此红牡丹系列更像是游戏,而仅看这一部又具有了水晶球的形态。

我还要说的是《国风》,“新生活运动”的代表作。(已经不能知晓是罗明佑还是朱石麟主导把临近片尾的一次字幕设计成旋转样式)正是结尾的旋转,即字幕上说的“洪水猛跌”,让我们知道原来这一切真的是个水晶球。

水晶球的世界就是没有两面的世界。

我理解爱森斯坦为什么可以不停地说下去,不停地比喻,首先我们不需要想有没有人走出水晶球这个问题,没错,因为除了水晶球外什么都没有,在水晶球外仍然是水晶球。

 5 ) 一个被惯坏的公子哥

  Orson Welles声称这是唯一一部它看过第二遍的自己拍的电影,也就是说这是它自己的“最爱”了。
   但我并不认为这是他最好的作品, 这主要还是因为那个其实是被愚蠢的制片方硬梆梆嫁接上去的“大团圆”结局。(据说这还是原著小说的结尾!?)
   在我所看过的Orson Welles的所有作品中,它是唯一一部,没有使用很多让人目眩神迷的“交叉蒙太奇”的电影,比前者更难得的是,它居然是一部以感情戏为主的电影!
  细腻,温润的让人感觉快要让人认不出来是(Orson Welles的电影了)。
  整部影片的(主线)基本上就是详述一个被惯坏的富家子弟大半辈子的人生(心路)历程。扮演“富家子”的Tim Holt在这部电影展现了天才般的演技,他是这部电影的灵魂!(甚至可以说,比导演本人更重要)。

 6 ) Robert Carringer 的文章

The Magnificent Ambersons

http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/803-the-magnificent-ambersons

If events had turned out differently, The Magnificent Ambersons, Orson Welles’ second film, might well be widely regarded as “the greatest film of all time” rather than Citizen Kane. But in Welles’ absence, RKO Studios recut the original version of the film mercilessly—Welles said it looked like it had been “edited with a lawn mower”—reducing its running time from 131 to the present 88 minutes. Nevertheless, what survives is still one of the most strikingly beautiful and technically innovative films ever to come out of Hollywood. It also tells a good story—about the decline of a once powerful and wealthy turn-of-the-century Midwestern family—with a conviction and maturity that are rare for the old Hollywood system.

It was a well-kept secret that Citizen Kane left Welles so emotionally and creatively exhausted that he was sent away on doctor’s orders to undergo a rest cure. The only surprise in this is that he had managed to hold out for so long. Citizen Kane was the culmination of almost a decade of frenetic energy that included early fame on Broadway and in radio, a short-lived but widely felt revolution in the American theater, the international scandal of the “War of the Worlds” broadcast, and a Hollywood contract that virtually gave him carte blanche. In Kane, at age 25, he had taken on one of the most powerful figures in American public life, publisher William Randolph Hearst, and after the film was made, had had to resist crushing pressures from all sides to get it released.

When he turned to his second film, Welles was in a quieter, more reflective mood. Critics have puzzled over his choice of The Magnificent Ambersons. Perhaps we should see it as an episode of personal stock-taking after a prolonged interval of intense stress. With its strongly autobiographical elements—its setting at the time and place of Welles’ own youth, its brash and arrogant and supremely self-confident young hero, and its obsessive Oedipal concerns—clearly Tarkington’s novel is serving at one level as a means for Welles to delve into his own roots and search out the meaning of his own personal past.

In an earlier, simpler time, how many millions of American boys read Penrod, Booth Tarkington’s modern version of Huckleberry Finn? Welles did, and many other Tarkington works. Tarkington was a regular staple for Welles’ Mercury Theatre radio show, and on the Mercury Theatre broadcast of the novel he called The Magnificent Ambersons, “the truest, cruelest picture of the growth of the Middle West.” At 240 pounds and well over six feet, Welles was wrong for George, Tarkington’s college-boy hero, in the film. In a move that surprised everyone, he selected RKO contract player Tim Holt for the role. (Usually thought of as just a cowboy actor, Holt turned in several notable dramatic performances in his career, most especially in The Magnificent Ambersons and in John Huston’s The Treasure of the Sierra Madre.) For the mother, Welles brought silent star Dolores Costello, one of the great beauties of the 1920s and the former Mrs. John Barrymore, out of retirement. For George’s sweetheart, he selected an unknown starlet Anne Baxter—another inspired choice, as her subsequent career, especially in All About Eve, amply shows. The roster was filled out with Mercury Theatre players who had also been in Citizen Kane—most notably Joseph Cotten, at his most insinuatingly charming, and, unforgettably, Agnes Moorehead, who won the New York Film Critics’ Award for her performance. Although Welles did not appear onscreen himself, he was present in the role he perhaps coveted most—that of the voice-over narrator, intoning Tarkington’s elegant, old-fashioned prose. On the technical side, Bernard Herrmann, another hold-over from Citizen Kane, composed one of his subtlest scores; Stanley Cortez, a relative unknown, as cinematographer was responsible for the astonishingly beautiful lighting of the interior scenes; and veteran art director Mark-Lee Kirk was borrowed from 20th Century Fox to oversee the design and constructionof the Ambersons’ mansion, one of the costliest and most complex sets ever built on a Hollywood sound stage.

Midway through the shooting of The Magnificent Ambersons, Welles was recruited by the U.S. State Department Committee on Inter-American Affairs to make a film in South America as a gestureto promote hemispheric relations inwartime. He rushed Ambersons to completion, entrusting the final editing (according to his close in-tructions) to Robert Wise, another holdover from Citizen Kane, and departed for South America. When the Welles version elicited disastrous results in sneak previews, the RKO regime ordered Wise to recut The Magnificent Ambersons into “releasable” shape. More than 50 minutes of Welles’ footage were removed, and several scenes were rewritten and reshot by others. This radically shortened version was put into release, and the studio ordered all surviving footage from the original version destroyed. Welles was terminated from RKO, and never again in his career was he entrusted with the direction of a major studio feature.

Even in its truncated form, the brilliance of The Magnificent Ambersons is evident. This was demonstrated most strikingly in 1982, when leading international film critics voted it one of the ten greatest films ever made.

 短评

窥见一斑,可惜是88分钟的

8分钟前
  • 甘草披萨
  • 推荐

奥逊·威尔斯第二作,因为被雷电华剥夺终剪权,目前只遗留下88分钟版本,不过,私以为现在能看到的版本也没什么大问题,稍许留白、混乱和破碎并未折损它的凄美,反而更契合于影片所呈现的家族没落——再盛大的辉煌,最终也不过是过眼云烟,徒留历史的碎片残存于世。贵族阶级的衰亡(富不过三代)与现代工业家的兴起(寄生继承vs.白手起家),自私、傲慢、恋母而游手好闲的末代公子,为了孩子和家族牺牲个人幸福的女性,还有终身不渝、或隐秘或公开、最终却只能停留于念想的爱情。影片的深焦摄影与运动长镜成效卓著,而且毫无炫技或喧宾夺主之感,形式和内容已经融为一体,不可分离。(8.5/10)

12分钟前
  • 冰红深蓝
  • 推荐

2012/12/17想看,是因为摄影还是什么?故事就是一个富二代熊孩子作死,要是没有最后几分钟结局就太解气了。剪成这样还是可以看到与众不同的气质的,毕竟那时候好莱坞这种描绘家族画卷感的时代剧很罕见。

14分钟前
  • \t^h/
  • 还行

給我是威爾斯的話當年早跟萬惡的片商拚了!超過一半時長被強行剪掉,整齣電影基本是以肢離破碎的面貌示人!本來我還陶醉於威爾斯優雅大氣的長鏡頭及深焦攝影,可惜往後卻因劇情殘缺而越看越糊塗

16分钟前
  • 百年孤寂
  • 还行

非常不威尔斯的一部片,说教又happy ending。唯几个场景的运镜看出威尔斯的灵魂。另外这个88分钟的版本是不是剪乱了,节奏很跳跃。

20分钟前
  • scaryzion
  • 还行

剪切略混乱,人物造型很精致

22分钟前
  • 泰坦
  • 还行

俄狄浦斯的小男孩不需要爱情。开头真是好“那时候镇上所有的女人都互相认识,每个家庭都互相认识彼此的马车”女人穿戴项链和手镯,男人带着各式帽子,裤子绝不能起皱,反正他们有的是时间。后半程断断续续被剪得不知所云了,像这场工业革命一样的快,赶着时间将安倍逊的辉煌和大宅一起丢进逝去的时代。

23分钟前
  • Aby
  • 还行

the first montage sequence is very impressive

26分钟前
  • 葱油饼
  • 推荐

果然支离破碎,从碎片推断其原有面目的盛大辉煌。

31分钟前
  • 欢乐分裂
  • 推荐

88分版剧情太浓缩不能很当真,倒是把注意力都收到电影语言了。安家人经常笼罩在阴影里不惜让你看不清脸,室内拍得嗲。长镜头一堆,从一楼大厅一路摇到三楼那个,炫技派~

35分钟前
  • paradiso
  • 还行

原版到底是个啥样啊

36分钟前
  • 暗黑4出了吗
  • 还行

本片提名奥斯卡最佳女配角和最佳影片等奖项

37分钟前
  • (๑⁼̴̀д⁼̴́๑)
  • 还行

原著小说作者是WELLES一家的朋友,这也是为什么ORSON WELLES想改编这部作品的原因之一。另外ORSON WELLES也一直怀疑里面GERGOE这个角色是以他为原型的,因为他的全名就叫做GEORGE ORSONWELES(乔治-奥森-威尔斯)。

39分钟前
  • 祥雪
  • 力荐

奥森·威尔斯的第二部影片,由布斯.塔金顿的同名小说改编而成,描绘安伯逊家族的兴衰史,并以男主角介入安伯逊家族母子之间后,牵扯出一连串爱恨情仇的故事作为主轴。这部“剪得支离破碎的杰作”仍在电影史上和威尔斯的作品中占有一席不容忽视的地位,被普遍认为是仅次于《公民凯恩》的“准杰作”。

43分钟前
  • stknight
  • 推荐

看的88分钟版明显不会是导演剪的版本,期望能看到148分钟的初始版

46分钟前
  • 蓝翼
  • 推荐

Another Hamlet Story. 剪刀无处不在,Orson Welles的口述饱含讽刺

48分钟前
  • Lies and lies
  • 推荐

那么疯狂的买下来,放了3年才看...

50分钟前
  • UrthónaD'Mors
  • 还行

外人拍摄的结尾不评价,但这可能是最黑暗肃杀的情节剧了,威尔斯在《凯恩》后似乎有意放慢脚步,以内化的人物关系展现背叛和时代变迁,即使被片厂删减大半依旧能看到威尔斯更进一步的调度与情绪。

55分钟前
  • TWY
  • 推荐

原来新浪潮好几部电影最后制作人员和演员表用念的就是从这部里学的威尔森啊!跟公民凯恩差不多都是自传吧,但这部有点点无聊呃。威尔森完全是菲兹杰拉德式的导演,或许他是最适合拍菲兹传记的人了吧,可惜没有,旧时光已死。

59分钟前
  • 还行

这个版本呈现出来的内容,不足以支撑威尔斯喜欢的宏大叙事,这恐怕不光是剪辑的问题。

1小时前
  • 苏莫
  • 还行