午夜快车

HD

主演:布拉德·戴维斯,艾琳·米拉科,博·霍普金斯,保罗·博纳切利,约翰·赫特

类型:电影地区:未知语言:未知年份:1990

 量子

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 无尽

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 剧照

午夜快车 剧照 NO.1午夜快车 剧照 NO.2午夜快车 剧照 NO.3午夜快车 剧照 NO.4午夜快车 剧照 NO.5午夜快车 剧照 NO.6午夜快车 剧照 NO.13午夜快车 剧照 NO.14午夜快车 剧照 NO.15午夜快车 剧照 NO.16午夜快车 剧照 NO.17午夜快车 剧照 NO.18午夜快车 剧照 NO.19午夜快车 剧照 NO.20

 剧情介绍

午夜快车电影免费高清在线观看全集。
  本片根据真实事件改编  1970年,来自美国长岛中产阶级家庭的青年希斯(Brad Davis饰)与女友来到土耳其度假,临行前希斯偷携了两公斤大麻,不料登机时暴露,并因藏匿毒品被捕。希斯在被押往监狱的路上逃脱失败后又遭监狱官毒打,所幸他很快结识了两位狱友:吉米(Randy Quaid 饰)与艾力(Norbert Weisser 饰),并开始逐渐熟悉土耳其监狱中如露天市场般混乱荒诞的生活环境。  虽经父亲多方努力,但希斯仍不得不忍受四年刑期。四年后即将出狱时却正逢美土交恶,希斯不巧被改判三十年,成为了外交的牺牲品。艾力这时又刑满释放,希斯的承受力面临崩溃,最终决定加入到吉米的逃狱计划中去……少林三十六房约定 〜16年的真相〜天堂岛疑云:圣诞特辑2022国王与我理发师的情人高材生芭比娃娃之真假公主冰雪战士扫毒行动2022刺客荣耀—荆轲素还真喋血宣德战机:空中勇士 第六季炮弹专家回魂夜粤语版家有儿女3英雄第一季安娜·卡列尼娜1997山间的生命极限老广的味道第一季血滴子2012全员单恋逝者之证第一季雷霆纵横风流艳妇星际之门:真理之盒风之庭院少年派魔物娘的同居日常OVA国家地理经典照片重现沙皇帝国:俄罗斯罗曼诺夫王朝从JK重新开始的老年计划Play Guide白专家黄河魂垃圾男孩太行山上六木道长九个完美陌生人乌鸦男孩实习医生格蕾 第九季四郎探母夺命大夜班权欲第二章第三季

 长篇影评

 1 ) 戏剧化的真实故事

经典的越狱片之一,即使在如今这个年代,无数参差不齐的越狱类型片奔涌而出,《午夜快车》也依旧是一部精彩的不可复制的好电影。

《午夜快车》的故事是由一个真实事件改编而来的。但在这里,这个故事要比原事件戏剧化很多,所表达出来的东西更为深刻丰富。都说艺术是源于生活却又高于生活的。这个故事来自生活,但它被奥利弗 斯通用戏剧化的文字重新组装了一遍,还是原来的骨架却被换了一身皮囊。这就好比现在的整容,初衷都是为了将更好的自己展现在众人眼前。幸运的是它没被整残,所以成了经典。

电影改编了剧情同时也改编了人物,这让原本可能太过极端可怕的故事在看似极端的环境下变得合理且温馨。电影就是有这个魔力让一切可怕的变成温馨甜蜜,反之亦然。在这个故事中所有的人物都是立体的。主人公Billy从一开始的胆怯紧张到后来为朋友杀人近乎疯狂;Jim从一个文弱友爱的书生竟为朋友而起了杀心……类似这样前后强烈的反差不仅仅体现出了人物的精神压力和性格变化,更是有效的凸显出了环境对于人的摧残,以及在畸形不健全的法律政治的操控下整个社会的阴暗可怕。相较于说教或是直接表现黑暗的故事,这样的情节安排更能打动人心,引起关注。确实,在这部影片播出后得到了美国政府的关注,解救了不少被土耳其莫名扣押下的“罪人”。

不说其他,只聊故事。从整体来看,这个故事是由一条主线发展的,开头十分钟主线故事的激励事件出场--Billy在机场被抓(这是第一幕的一个小高潮)。在Billy被抓前影片的节奏就是一张一弛的,导演从一开始就把电影的整体节奏规划好了。Billy在第一次被检查时的紧张,可以从他脸颊上不知是汗水还是自来水的特写感触到,被顺利放行后与女友在车上调情时的轻松有效的缓解了刚才的紧张,紧接着激励事件的爆发,成功的从一开始就奠定出了影片基调,使得之后的剧情发展基本都是按照这个基调、节奏继续。故事发展的张弛得当,让没有运用什么电影技巧的片子依旧能够扣人心弦,让人从剧情上喜欢这个电影。这足以说明这个剧本确确实实是一个好剧本,奥利弗 斯通既是一位优秀导演同时也是一位会讲故事的好编剧。

 2 ) What is a crime

Intense and mind-boggling. A seemingly deserving punishment from a stupid mistake turned out to be violating humanity. Humans weren't treated equally as humans sometimes. Sometimes they're benefits and sometimes they're cannon fodders, or just flickering head counts for the accountants. Why is it so simple for people to lose mercy yet so hard to retain justice and good ethics?

The monologue stuck in me is this:

What is a crime? What is a punishment? It seems to vary from time to time and from place to place. What's legal today is suddenly illegal tomorrow because some society says it's so and what's illegal yesterday is suddenly legal because everybody's doing it and you can't put everybody in jail. I'm not saying this is right or wrong. I'm just saying that's the way it is...And you, I just wish you could be standing where I'm standing right now and feel what that feels like because then you would know something that you don't know Mr. prosecutor. Mercy! You'd know that the concept of a society is based on the quality of that mercy, its sense of fair play, its sense of justice.

The movie passes a sense of magical reality with the downhill scene switching from the airport to the ghettos, and then to the prison, and finally to the psychiatric house. Nothing felt realistic yet everything happened for real. Both the acting and the shooting were blatant and bold to give that realistic and ridiculous feeling such as the brutal fighting between the protagonist Willliam Hayes and his fellow indiscreet prisoner Rifki, whose tongue was biten off by Hayes at the end of the fight, which was quite unexpected and cultish. Besides, you got to see a showcase of environmental homesexuality, the raw sexual desire and psychiatric decomposition from the prolonged detention. The overall atmosphere felt typical of the 1970s.

Lastly, another thing I agree with in the film:

Loneliness is a physical pain.

One last reminder, I watched this film because of Giorgio Moroder and Querelle

 3 ) 小弟的大學要求寫的影評

上課的時候教授要求寫的....參考了許多此板大大們的影評寫出來的...有興趣看看吧....:) [劇情透露]

Midnight Express Movie Review

Almost all great films about prison break are not simply action-packed ticket-sellers that seek to thrill the audience. What makes these films great is the depth they went into to explore the darkest and at the same time, the brightest themes of human society and lives. Corruption, violence, sexual abuse, justice, injustice, homosexuality, dignity, love, freedom and hope, all of which are seen throughout the whole film. The setting itself is another interesting topic, meaning the prison, like a microcosm of the society outside. Overall, the film tells a story of man's endeavor to self-redemption and self-justice against odds from the political and structural obstacles of the real world, despite a sensible political undertone against Islamic nations.

The Story
On October 6, 1970, Billy Hayes, an American is on a trip back to America from Turkey with his girlfriend Susan. While boarding a flight at the Istanbul Airport, Billy is caught smuggling 2 kilos of dope. He is told by the authorities that if he cooperates in finding the actual drug dealer he will be released. For some reasons he tries to escape after the assistance and is captured. With the support from the American embassy, he is sentenced to only over four years for possession of drug, but is exempted from the more serious charges of smuggling and drug dealing.

The prison as expected is not a very hospitable place. It is crowded, filthy and ruled over by Warden Hamidou who punishes the prisoners with harsh physical and mental tortures. Billy, however, does manage to befriend a few inmates, an American named Jimmy, who is imprisoned for stealing candlesticks from a mosque, and an English named Max, who is sentenced for over 12 years for smuggling 100 grams of drug. At this point, it is becoming obvious that foreign prisoners are only tools and sacrifices in political maneuvers between the Turkish government and other Western governments. The only seeming way out is to catch the "midnight express", namely prison break. The inmates start planning the escape routes.

Many of their attempts failed, and the “insider” prisoner Rifki informs Hamidou on their scheme. Jimmy is taken away to brutal punishment. Max and Billy take revenge to Rifki by destroying his dashed money. Without any evidence, however, Rifki frames Max, and Max meets a similar fate as Tommy does. As Billy is told the court resentence him to up to 30 years in prison on drug smuggling, he cannot contain his emotions any longer. He attacks Rifki and bites off part of his tongue.
After many months in the prison ward for the insane, Billy is at the brink of total breakdown. This is when his girlfriend Susan visits and delivers him her love, hope to survive and some cash hidden within a photography book. Billy starts to plan to escape again. He bribes the Warden and asks to be transferred to the sanatorium where there is a chance of escaping. Instead, Hamidou drags Billy to a cell, beats him down and tries to rape him. In despair, Billy kills Hamidou and escapes with the Warden’s outfit. And it is revealed that Billy flees to Greece and flies his way back to The States and the reunion with his family.

Justice and Injustice
Often times when we try to define justice and injustice, we resort to the laws, which supposedly take into account the moral standards of a given society. But this is not necessary when the government takes other things onto their priority list such as their power of control, political stability, economic interests and in this case, political maneuvers with foreign nations. Under such conditions, laws can no longer uphold justice but become a tool wielded by the government for their own propuses.

In the movie, it is revealed that Nixon’s US government is at bad terms with the Turkish government. As a result foreign prisoners become valuable assets to the Turkish government in dealing with The US. In a beginning of the film, passengers for international flights not only need to pass through normal airport checking routines, before they board, soldiers also search their bodies one by one, and Billy is then found carrying dope. Let Billy’s personal case aside, this measure is questionable. It might be due to the Turkish government’s tightened measures against drug-smuggling, but it might very well be a political measure to attain more foreign prisoners.

In the prison, Billy learns that many foreign inmates are serving unreasonable sentence years. It might be the result of difference in customary laws regarding crimes in different countries, but it might as well be a way to retain the government’s valuable assets, as Billy after almost finishing serving his initial sentence, faces serious charges of smuggling and is resentenced up to 30 years in jail. It makes one wonder what causes such an abrupt change, could it be the result of a worsen diplomatic relationship with Turkey and The US? Either way, justice is vague. Should a man of a certain sociocultural upbringing face criminal charges in a different sociocultural background? Where is justice for individuals when they are of only small part of a much bigger scheme?

Billy, at his defense in court against smuggling charges, says “What is crime, what is punishment? It seems to vary from time to time, from place to place. What’s legal today is suddenly illegal tomorrow because some society says so. What’s illegal yesterday is legal today because everybody’s doing it. They can’t put everybody in jail.” Ironically it seems that his words are not even translated properly to the judge, assuming the judge does not speak English. So if the system does not grant individual justice, the only justice one can find is through self-redemption, a prison break, a breach through the system. This is the underlying premise in most prison break stories from “Shawshank Redemption” in 1995 to the hit American TV series “Prison Break” and to “The Next Three Days” in 2010. These screenplays’ success implies an unshakable belief in moral justice that most people uphold but is often disregarded due to different sociopolitical or cultural circumstances.

Prison and Society
One might expect prison to be a place of rehibilitation and reeducation for the social deviated so that they can be reassimilated back to the society. In reality, however, prison is hardly such a place in a sense that it has its own power control, hierarchy, division that works like ethnicity and nationality, social rules and taboos. The prison with all these elements as a whole is but a microcosm of the society that it derived from. Similar to Marxist's idea of the base and the superstructure, people with a certain set of sociocultural upbringings recreate the prison to be functional in the same way as the society does.

In the prison in "Midnight Express", ethnic or racial division is not clearly observed due to the relative narrow ethnic spectrum of the Turks, so the most prominent division is between the local and the foreign. The prison in America, however, as observed in "The Shawshank Redemption" or "The Next Three Days", is devided mostly among the white, the black, the Asian and the Mexican. This reveals the exact same way the respective societies devide themselves. What does not change is human's tendency to corruption, and this is seen very clearly in the film. When Billy's father comes to Turkey to hire a local lawyer in Billy's defence, the lawyer tells them that with money favourable court and judge can be arraged, and it does seem to work out seeing that Billy is only doing 4 years without serious charges of drug-smuggling.
It is the same trick but different places.

Hope and Prison
In "The Shawshank Redemption" Morgan Freeman speaks of "Institutionalization", and likewise Al Pacino in "Carlito's Way" talks about his thoughts on prison "You don't get reformed, you just run out of wind." The harsh reality in prison strips a man off everything he ever possesses that can define himself. Your possession is gone when you go in jail, your connections fade as family, friends and lover slowly drift away, your dignity is no more when someone forces you to fellatio, and hope is perhaps the most important thing above all, that once lost dooms a man.

One can see how devastated Billy is after hearing he is resentenced to more than 30 years in jail for smuggling. A hope for freedom taken away like that can drive anyone mad. Jimmy loses himself fanatically trying to escape and meets a gruesome end, and Max withers to a walking corpse after too much torture. Even out of prison, one has not really left the prison. The old man Brook's tragic suicide in "The Shawshank Redemption" proves just that. If Susan does not come to visit Billy and gives him the desire and hope to survive and self-rescue, it is not difficult to imagine how his fate will be sealed. Andy Dufresne says in his letter to Red "Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things." It indeed is despite the various sociocultural background that an individual might be from.

The American Bias and Propaganda
From most modern and western point of view, the escape of Billy from prison might strike one as of a noble cause or is it? In the film, it is depicted that many foreigners are imprisoned on heavy sentences due to but "relatively" mild criminal deeds. Based on American standards, these sentences are unjust and barbaric, but is judicial freedom and independence not so highly upheld by the so-called democratic America? A few years back, The US president Clinton personally arrived in Singapore and successfully intervened with a case of a teenager being sentenced to caning. Such action is never seen among The States, but it however could be applied outside The US judicial boundaries.

Corruption is considered a despicable crime in America, who often times criticizes other non-western countries for their corrupted bureaucracy and judiciary. However, in "Midnight Express" Billy and his father's maneuvers to bribe the authorities for more favorable courts and judge are considered a justified mean to a noble end. This image of direct involvement in a corrupt judiciary system proves hypocritical to what The US government advocates.

In an interview with the real Billy Hayes, based on whose story this film was shot, he revealed that contrary to what is depicted in the film, the prison guards and wardens were mostly fair and hard-working, and only one guard as he recalled punished prisoners for whatever reasons. In reality, Billy did not kill anyone, and the Rifki character was solely created for the film, and the antagonist Warden Hamious did not die by Billy's hand but was shot to death by a discharged prisoner. After learning these facts, it makes one wonder if "Midnight Express" is but an American propaganda against Islamic or Arabic nations. Ironically, the film was allowed to be screened in Turkey. No matter the purposes the film was made for, artistic or commercial, it is not easy to ignore the sociocultural background of the place of production.

Other
The film's heart-wrenching soundtrack composed by Giorgio Moroder won both the Academy Awards and the Golden Globes for Best Original Score in 1979. Although the score is scarcely scattered through the film, leaving most of the scenes unaccompanied, it however adds more sense of realism and the occasional Arabic tunes display perfectly the Islamic setting of the film. The most memorable themes are the love theme and the ending theme which are very fitting and moving.

Cast-wise, Brad Davis for the role of Billy Hayes, Irene Miracle for the role of Susan and John Hurt for the role of Max received highly positive critics, winning respective Golden Globes awards for the year. Sadly, Brad Davis died of AIDS complications in 1991 at the age of 41, leaving his wife and only child.

 4 ) 《午夜快车》chase and go。

《午夜快车》有一个前期的段落,主角威廉海耶斯因为寒冷拿了监狱里的大私货贩子瑞福里的“货物”被子用来盖,结果被瑞福里联合狱警狠狠的修理了一通,整个脚被警棍打烂。当他从第二天醒来时,他发现自个儿被放置在一个洗漱台附近的房间。那个场景一开始的交代环境的主镜头让人记忆犹新,带着轻微的晃动,画面从上往下摇,昏暗的,带着尘土质感的光线零零散散地分布在空间里,监狱里分不清是清真寺样式还是东正教风格的窗阑被照耀出救赎的感觉,然而紧接着便是主角疲惫的痛苦模样。在那一刻,电影似乎才把自己的想说的理念展示出来——天地不仁。

诚然,本片在中国的评价很一般。它属于的那个时代,那个运动(新好莱坞),有太多魅力了,到现在仍然如同海市蜃楼一样吸引着诸多的人。但,众所周知,除去电影独特的影像特性之外,花絮以及透露出的剧情理念,自始至终让很多人对大部分的电影评价不纯粹。新好莱坞尤其会被特殊对待,这些冷战色彩浓厚以及反映美国本土政治事件的电影,在普世价值还没那么泛滥之前,在高度娱乐化还没成滥觞之前出现,因为独特的,或多或少党同伐异的,激进的表达而被现在大批习惯了“大片”的观众所嫌弃。如果与现在社会的普遍观念不同更是会被扣上各种帽子。比如本片在各大中国平台,最主要的评价无非是“意识形态输出毒草”,“洗白毒贩的电影”。

除开影像本身,改编原著作者确实有投机的一面。但是电影是应当看自己内容本身的,忽略内容,甚至时代性和地域性去定性一部电影或多或少大可不必了。本片以一个美国人的角度,侧面反映因为国家之间的无来由冲突而生活憋屈甚至绝望的一整个过程与浮世绘,远远超脱了简单的“文化输出”,是导演悲悯的体现;而对大环境的恰如其分的描写,符合真实历史的社会政治情绪,也正是让同时代美国人认可的主要原因。是脚踏实地的,服务本国人们的优质文艺作。

全片剧情掩藏着了不少思考,比如政治事件的意想不到影响,宗教对现代社会的无力而最一目了然的在于探讨秩序的B叙事。虽说主角因为贩毒而被判刑,但“毒品”这个元素更像是一种时代的切分点,由主角的父亲点出“是年轻人的特质”,而戏中围绕着主角判刑的弹性讨论才是重点,律师与法庭的一整个系列戏份的产生直接向我们展示带有人治色彩的法庭的可笑和明显缺点,律师通过人情,而不是法典来辩护,法官和执法者可以通过社会国家的立场改变随时让犯人获得新的罪名,司法程序毫无理性可言。而监狱中充斥着的私刑和陷害更是让主题更加沉重。近乎辱骂。

当然,本片的价值可不止丰富的主题;一直以来,所有文艺作品都很希望突出一种与现实相呼应的“真实感”,简单来说就是让观众相信故事里的所有要素的真实性。本片的创作者在各个层面上面,对于真实感的塑造都是教科书级别的精心。作为以“斗争者”出名的电影人,奥利弗斯通很早就有了风格化的戏剧文本的设计,并在本片中达到了出色的呈现。片中人物的对话和单人场景,譬如重要人物瘾君子的第一次出场的对话与后期愿想破灭后的法庭戏都被设计出一种类似于帕索里尼的临场采访感觉。这样能快速的让观众纳入大量信息,点出小环境(监狱)的人物生存状态,并细枝末节地勾勒大的历史背景,高效率地完成叙事,让观众以最快的时间贴着主角的视角判断,感受角色的情绪。另一方面,除去传统化的三幕大结构,大量纪实化的片段(与主角无多关系的片面事件)被穿插在各种剧情里,进一步反应整个叙述地点的特质(譬如残酷以及野蛮),与此同时提供诸多混乱丰富的符号供人解答,杀猫一场戏尤为震撼,直接了当的把人物在环境里的渺小给赤裸裸的公开,力度相当强。

光有一个好的剧本是不足以的,艾伦帕克本人很独到并且清晰的调度也是让本片出采的原因。艾伦帕克在本片中虽然没有体现出才气很大的影像段落,但是“稳当”和“毫厘不爽”的按照特定理念和逻辑设计电影才是重点。

本片一共有两种影像的主旨构成,其中第一种便是“纪实性”,或者说基础性的“纪实性”,这从一开始便被导演释放在了开头,通过连贯的声音,一系列时长短小,带着记录感的构图被连在一起,与主角收拾自己与毒品的场景“打擂台”。从此,至少在影像流动的角度,记录感片段与剧情片段的区别以及相互照应的流程便牢牢地按在了观众的眼睛里。全片的影像风格非常统一,后面的审讯情节,逃跑时的餐馆场景以及监狱和精神病院中都出现的同样的分镜设计方式,不同场景便得以在这样的分镜设计里塞入更多指向和符号,更全面的认识情境,以及给人比人物空间走动更全面的临场感觉。

第二个主旨便是音乐性。岔开本身先锋味道十足的配乐看,很多情节被镜头搭配出一种音乐一样的韵律感,如同歌舞片一样层次鳞次栉比。前面的逃亡戏中,我们很自然的看见镜头的剪辑反应随着主角自身的情绪变化,以及pov视角张弛有度的插入。而后面和监狱私货贩子的打斗更是像歌剧一样,主角愤怒后达到情绪顶点,运动镜头抖动加快并且快速切入各种反应,最后也像音乐结束一样,剪辑放缓,人物运动变慢并呈现出悲怆的一面。最厉害的应该是精神病院的散步戏,如同音乐的段落变化,主角从病房进入一个构图上面如同一个昏暗的舞台的空间,人物茫然的运动,加上音效呈现出诡异的地狱质感。这简直就是歌舞片主角个人唱段的外化场景的另一维度翻版,从情节角度上,给观众的巨大震撼力也是无以言表。

除开好处,本片的缺点也很明显,甚至是,显而易见。理念上面,奥利弗斯通想要表达的东西依然过多以至于超越了他的能力,很多批判性质的想法没能全部呈现,最后转为了靠类型化的结局以及激烈发展让观众忽略思考的方式结束整部电影,确实是落入了下乘。而主角的表演的确实是稚嫩了很多,瘾君子的表演堪称极致,但监狱中其他人物的表演就有点一般了。但是忽略这一切,《午夜快车》足够优秀,既然我们想到这部电影的魅力之处就在于画面里的真实,以及踏实的表达,那就让我们用安静平静的情绪观看这部电影,体验那种悲悯的描写就行了。

 5 ) 监狱的日子

看评论前写两句,在加拿大的电影频道看的这个片子。看过越狱之后没有非常大的惊异,不过监狱的痛苦我想我肯定不能接受。有想到,现在在加拿大的日子就像坐牢,但是精神上的,不是真正监狱那种肉体和精神的双重折磨。电视上的版本删掉了探监的一部分,但土豆上有完整版的。主题音乐像是在一遍遍的哭泣,忏悔和对无尽头的压抑的控诉。有生之年,能亲身经历监狱的生活,如有机会出狱,才能感受自由的快乐。人在加拿大,生活安逸,精神却无助而孤独。想回家,但又不敢回,人生啊。

 6 ) 1978年 電影 Midnight Express - 午夜快車

1978年 電影 Midnight Express - 午夜快車

(觀後感)
 
 


片名:Midnight Express - 午夜快車
美國上映:1978年10月6日
香港上映:1978
導演:Alan Parker (1944-uk)
編劇:Oliver Stone (1946-usa) (真實故事)
演員:Brad Davis(1949-1991-usa), Irene Miracle(1954-usa), Bo Hopkins(1942)

每當看完一齣好電影,心情都非常滿足。
就如昨晚看了 1978年 的 Midnight Express 午夜快車。

Giorgio Moroder - Chase 和 Theme 這兩首曲。
兒時也不知道從那裡打進自己的耳朵,成為了經典而非常棒的音樂。

看著這個真實故事的劇情,心裡說(讚),口裡說(好)!

每次都一樣,看到好的舊片,總會加上一句,現在才看...

先說一下劇情:-

在 1970年,一位美國年輕人在土耳其機場因運毒而被捕。
有關當局警方盤問他的毒品來源,並告訴他,只要協助他們,成功逮捕毒品的源頭,就能釋放他。



可是年輕人輕率魯莽而試著逃亡但失敗,於是開啟了漫長的異地牢獄生涯,為期四年。

獄中生活當然不好受,還要在土耳其這個劣根性的國家。
除了面對殘酷成性的監獄守衛,還有同窗的奸詐囚犯。

雖然當中仍然有不少性情中人作伴,也曾提議一起逃獄,
年輕人當然拒絕,因為他監禁只是四年,若被逮捕,加監三五七年等閒事。



難捱的日子終於過去,刑期快將屆滿之際,監獄有通知他的案件重審,監禁不是四年,而是終身監禁...

一場惡夢才真正開始,逃獄不得不在他的念頭,而且要快。
就是這樣,展開了一場午夜快車...




電影看完了。

心裡很讚嘆!

首先,先說一下我家裡有位(電影蟲隱士),經常鞭撻我,時間有限,應該看什麼,不應該看什麼...
就像這齣午夜快車,是他力推~ 盡管看了,還是陪我看,(應該說,是要我看!)

開場不久,那經典的音樂 (Theme)隨即而來,把我的投入感推上了一層。

男主角 Brad Davis 出場,那輕率、犯法而任性的性格演繹,判囚、對抗、呆坐、失落、至絕望。
整個過程,看到他的演繹變化,做得相當好。



導演:Alan Parker 把故事說得透徹,尤其在土耳其那場語言不通的法庭戲,不合理的法律制度。
看到男主角默默接受這場審判,極為諷刺的語言和精神強暴。

男主角有兩段感情戲,非常簡短,卻令人深刻與大膽。
幸好我看的版本沒有被刪剪去。

盡管說這故事加了虛構而醜化土耳其國家,但都不重要。
因為始終看了一場好的電影。

原著小說是當事人 Billy Hayes 編寫的。



不過現在才知道,以前看的 1987年電影 監獄風雲,周潤發咬掉張耀揚耳朵的一整幕,原來九成似這齣 1978年的午夜快車,不論是角度,鏡頭,演員的姿勢。
相信他們也十分喜愛這電影,或他向原創者致敬。




還有心情:
年輕人也好,成年人也好,做任何事前要三思,犯法的真不要做,不要貪圖小利,真的會終身後悔,多多錢也不要。

*男主角Brad Davis跟 Brad Bitt

Brad Davis

Brad Bitt


導演:Alan Parker (1944-uk)


編劇:Oliver Stone (1946-usa)




* 跟隨著 午夜快車 的原聲音樂,邊寫下這小文,寫意的。
力推的電影!


多謝你看了這篇小文章。

如果覺得不錯,希望得到你們的贊賞。

因小小的贊賞,能給我大大的動力。

感謝!


文goods_hk @東加豆

([email protected])

 短评

the bad machine doesn't know he is a bad machine.土耳其、毒品、越狱

7分钟前
  • 八部半
  • 推荐

我对这片的政治倾向没有看法,垃圾在于手法,导演绝不能上来就灌输,你面对的是有脑浆的成年观众,怎么能像对肠病患者一样灌肠呢?谁他妈的欠你钱了还是怎么地?年轻斯通的剧本跟摄影师Seresin还是不错的,尤其Seresin既能根据傻逼帕克的要求拍些直露到死的幼稚镜头,也能干出很玄乎的活

11分钟前
  • 左胸上的吸盘
  • 还行

重看。还是加一星。剪辑的意味全在靠碎片化的,剪映化的极佳摄影空境拼在一起,满足导演和观众同样的对异域的好奇。而剩下的对话与交流,乃至人物的行动则突出一种刻意的超现实,粗糙的真实场景搭配颇具设计感的运镜和视角选择甚至有种诗意(类似于顶级的林岭东?)导演极其会表现痛苦,好几场写实凌厉的动作戏让人无法自拔,堪称暴力美学典范。总体而言算是新好莱坞中上水准作品。可惜的地方就在于导演的右翼倾向以及作为中国人对FD案件的敏感了(我倒是还讨厌本片表达出的对第三世界国家的不尊重)偶对了,配乐极佳。

14分钟前
  • 巅峰Futurama迷
  • 推荐

尽管在评论与商业上都取得了成功,电影中对于土耳其人的塑造却充满了争议:http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/MidExp-academic.htm。着墨不多的同性情节拍得颇为梦幻,彷如黑暗中的一点微光。

15分钟前
  • Marty McFly
  • 还行

OliverStone编剧,土耳其监狱里的美国人,尼克松外交、美土关系短暂紧张的牺牲品。土耳其人被刻画得面目可憎。4年刑期一朝变成30年,挖眼咬舌打斗戏、女友探监手淫戏,BradDavis歇斯底里的表演都让人印象深刻。结尾逃出生天过程戏剧化,连续的定格画面、凄清的主题音乐升华了情绪。那段同性镜头颇诡异

16分钟前
  • 莱尼圆
  • 推荐

多么痴情的姑娘 过了好几年了还去探监 激起了他的求生欲望 姑娘你这么深情 怎么过了好几年才去看你的心上人呢 至于美国的政治立场及对土耳其的丑化 见仁见智吧

21分钟前
  • ╯-╰
  • 还行

根据比利海耶斯的同名自传改编,「午夜快车」是狱友对越狱的代称。斯通凭借这个戏拿了奥斯卡最佳改编剧本,但选材的话题性肯定要压过剧本本身的水平:主角在「毫无民主人权」的土耳其因为走私大麻这样的「小罪名」先受了三年牢狱之灾,即将出狱之时又成为了美土外交危机的牺牲品,被改判了终身监禁。精神世界逐步崩塌的他先杀监狱恶霸后杀政府恶警后,终于逃出生天。故事听起来当然有足够的传奇性,也符合好莱坞主流审美的品味(毕竟几十年后他们还在拍《逃离德黑兰》),但总体充斥大量对土耳其人的刻板描写和生硬直给的痛苦展现,像主角最终穿着警服走出监狱时先慢慢踱步再开始飞奔最后定格在跳跃上之类的小设计还是太少了。技术部门里发挥得最好的是配乐,兼具异域风情与哀伤的基调。男主角眉目之间挺像年轻的卡拉格,约翰赫特演的马克斯我没认出来。

25分钟前
  • Mr.Graceless
  • 还行

http://www.2020-movie-reviews.com/reviews-year/1978-movie-reviews/midnight-express-1978-movie-review/

29分钟前
  • 赱馬觀♣
  • 还行

“一部坏的机器,不知道自己是部坏的机器。”

31分钟前
  • Lan~die
  • 推荐

预期很高,于是落差很大,比较失望,很难投入,开头还好,后面监狱生活就开始迷失重点了,观众不需要像主角一样感到煎熬,尤其是无法产生情绪反应只能冷眼旁观的煎熬。//女友探监的段落很棒,把性压抑的煎熬拍出来了。

33分钟前
  • 私恋失调
  • 还行

看得好累啊这个真的不大适合我看。。(【电影男孩】04. 午夜快车)

38分钟前
  • Paktin
  • 还行

是極其不一樣的監獄/越獄題材電影。十分震撼。考察演員本身的生命便知道這樣一部電影和演員的關系是神來安排的。另一個Anthony Perkins。音樂雖然古老,但短暫的高潮和結尾被其提升到了極致。

42分钟前
  • PETE.
  • 力荐

不可避免地有美式爱管闲事的政治立场和抹黑伊斯兰国家的嫌疑,但是真正意义拍出了监狱对人精神层面上的摧残,比一般越狱片更深刻。

43分钟前
  • cjy
  • 推荐

七〇年一二逼美国仔因携带大麻关进土耳其监狱,三年将满时美土交恶,判了无期。期间越狱不成,挨打受饿,最后一次被牢头单打时牢头摔死,遂换装逃出。有点小文艺,因为笔触太细腻。故事本无奇,在政治对垒上倾述过多。跟《生不承情》一样,虽然能连贯看进去,但颇觉没他们说的那么好,四星够了。

46分钟前
  • 小重山
  • 推荐

斯通的编剧也就这回事,前面拖沓的要死,后面的越狱又显得太仓促,没法让人信服。约翰·亨特的这个角色摆明了是要向《巴比龙》中的达斯汀霍夫曼看齐~

48分钟前
  • 隐遁
  • 较差

1.同性情节突兀而莫名其妙;2.吊死猫的情节看不下去,不喜欢用这种手法制造角色矛盾;3.美国还真是坚持不懈抹黑他国啊。

51分钟前
  • 戴圣诞帽的楼主
  • 还行

最终还是赶上了午夜快车了,最后定格照片很专业。ps.片中种族歧视很严重

56分钟前
  • oranger
  • 还行

不知道是不是我想太多了,我觉得这片子的观点太片面了,既没有展现美国国内的情况,也没有给土耳其人说话的机会,这不是妖魔化土耳其人么,而且男主确实走私毒品了没错,还不许别人依法办他啦…

60分钟前
  • 柴斯卡
  • 较差

坦白地说,从电影本身来说,影片是过誉的。当然从政治意义上来说,对土耳其监狱黑暗面的揭露和谴责是达到的。更愿意把片子看做是搬演的纪录片而不是商业片。斯通的剧本,只有一处,就是比利对着探监的女友,让她脱去衣服手淫,让人记忆深刻,非常地惊心,不知道是真事还是虚构。花絮中的真人露面,讲述往事其实比影片更好看。我很想知道当时尼克松到底是什么事得罪了土耳其政府。

1小时前
  • 南团
  • 较差

还很清楚地记得自己第一次看这部电影,是在九十年代初的一个情人节的晚上,当时是出差去广州,一个人在酒店里。幸好有这部电影,让这个晚上不至于太无聊和寂寞。现在终于淘到这张碟,又重新看了一遍,感觉虽然没有第一次看那么精彩,但是年轻时的记忆犹存。

1小时前
  • 天兵
  • 推荐