量子
缺集或无法播，更换其他线路.优质
缺集或无法播，更换其他线路.红牛
缺集或无法播，更换其他线路.剧照
剧情介绍
最后的莫希干人电影免费高清在线观看全集。
本片改编自美国作家库柏“皮袜子”系列小说中的第二部。1757年七年战争期间，英法两军在北美殖民地激战正酣。军官邓肯带队护送长官之女可娜（Madeleine Stowe 饰）前往威廉亨利堡，半路遭法属印第安人埋伏，莫希干族最后的战士——金卡加（Russell Means 饰）、安卡斯父子与白人霍克依（Daniel Day-Lewis 饰）出手相救。但抵达要塞时他们发现这里已陷入战火，要塞长官门罗与邓肯做事强硬，不肯放走民兵自降战力，并将霍克依监禁，可娜这时已同霍克依相恋，但却无力援救。英军战事不利弃堡投降，印第安人马瓜带领族人向英军寻仇，可娜与霍克依失散后被马瓜带走，霍克依、金卡加、安卡斯一行进入马瓜族人的营地，以期带回可娜凭空而来唤醒死者第一季医者自医铁甲008血脉之树夜夜春宵逃学威龙2非正式会谈第六季那些名字那些年星际旅行：重返地球第二季天空的呼吸泰格·伍兹流淌的美好时光玫瑰之战东陵大盗（二）倩女幽魂本能 第一季盛唐妖异志玫瑰岛的不可思议的历史降灵日历安迪·麦克第一季蝎子拳王少年透明人寄宿学校疑云第二季探秘金刚塔莉莉安2019洪水再临锡瓦斯匪帮传奇衡阳会战梦精记2艾德的私人频道犯罪现场调查 第一季狼溪第一季鬼线人科学救援组我的错误迷失的情感
本片改编自美国作家库柏“皮袜子”系列小说中的第二部。1757年七年战争期间，英法两军在北美殖民地激战正酣。军官邓肯带队护送长官之女可娜（Madeleine Stowe 饰）前往威廉亨利堡，半路遭法属印第安人埋伏，莫希干族最后的战士——金卡加（Russell Means 饰）、安卡斯父子与白人霍克依（Daniel Day-Lewis 饰）出手相救。但抵达要塞时他们发现这里已陷入战火，要塞长官门罗与邓肯做事强硬，不肯放走民兵自降战力，并将霍克依监禁，可娜这时已同霍克依相恋，但却无力援救。英军战事不利弃堡投降，印第安人马瓜带领族人向英军寻仇，可娜与霍克依失散后被马瓜带走，霍克依、金卡加、安卡斯一行进入马瓜族人的营地，以期带回可娜凭空而来唤醒死者第一季医者自医铁甲008血脉之树夜夜春宵逃学威龙2非正式会谈第六季那些名字那些年星际旅行：重返地球第二季天空的呼吸泰格·伍兹流淌的美好时光玫瑰之战东陵大盗（二）倩女幽魂本能 第一季盛唐妖异志玫瑰岛的不可思议的历史降灵日历安迪·麦克第一季蝎子拳王少年透明人寄宿学校疑云第二季探秘金刚塔莉莉安2019洪水再临锡瓦斯匪帮传奇衡阳会战梦精记2艾德的私人频道犯罪现场调查 第一季狼溪第一季鬼线人科学救援组我的错误迷失的情感
长篇影评
1 ) 爱情，民族，自由
最后一个莫希干人是很多人颇为称道的名片了。可我总是先看过美国商业大片，在当期大片的DVDrip看完之后我才开始欣赏我的一些典藏。
最后一个莫西干人，就是如此。
所谓剧情，简介什么的我也无须再说，网上大把，背景故事也不用再提，非常喜欢的人可以直接买书来看。当当什么的都有。
我说说自己喜欢的地方，最后一个莫西干人在片中其实是千家谷，他在片尾那些话说的很有深意。白人会来到印第安人的这片土地，当一个个本地民族消失，同化，殖民这个概念其实也不复存在，这是历史发展的必然，你可以预见，但不可抗拒。
说起来最感动的场面，我看是英国军官德勒代替豪克依来顶替英国守军将领门罗的女儿歌娜要被烧死的那一幕，德勒之前是心仪于门罗的大女儿歌娜的，可是歌娜爱上了土著豪克依，在歌娜被另外的土著休伦族抓住要活活烧死的时候，豪克依去说情并想让休伦族的长老同意烧死自己换取歌娜的性命。做为豪克依的翻译的德勒，在这个时候本来是可以顺理成章的看到自己的情敌被烧死，自己就更有机会和生还的歌娜一起，但他翻译时故意说成了是自己要去代替被烧死......选择自己被活活烧死，祝福爱人和自己的情敌，这本是一个人不可能会做出来的选择，可是他这样做了。好伟大，真的好伟大。
另外一个情节也是感人至深，门罗的小女儿爱丽丝被豪克依的哥哥雍加爱慕，但她被休伦族的激进者马瓜胁迫，雍加去救爱丽丝却被马瓜杀死并从悬崖坠下，这时惊人的，在剧中一直羸弱的爱丽丝见此情景，居然自己毅然的跳入崖下。那份弱女子的勇敢和坚定让人敬佩不以。
你可以说这是一部战争片，在我心里，它也讲述了人性，爱，自由。
很好看的电影，推荐。
最后一个莫西干人，就是如此。
所谓剧情，简介什么的我也无须再说，网上大把，背景故事也不用再提，非常喜欢的人可以直接买书来看。当当什么的都有。
我说说自己喜欢的地方，最后一个莫西干人在片中其实是千家谷，他在片尾那些话说的很有深意。白人会来到印第安人的这片土地，当一个个本地民族消失，同化，殖民这个概念其实也不复存在，这是历史发展的必然，你可以预见，但不可抗拒。
说起来最感动的场面，我看是英国军官德勒代替豪克依来顶替英国守军将领门罗的女儿歌娜要被烧死的那一幕，德勒之前是心仪于门罗的大女儿歌娜的，可是歌娜爱上了土著豪克依，在歌娜被另外的土著休伦族抓住要活活烧死的时候，豪克依去说情并想让休伦族的长老同意烧死自己换取歌娜的性命。做为豪克依的翻译的德勒，在这个时候本来是可以顺理成章的看到自己的情敌被烧死，自己就更有机会和生还的歌娜一起，但他翻译时故意说成了是自己要去代替被烧死......选择自己被活活烧死，祝福爱人和自己的情敌，这本是一个人不可能会做出来的选择，可是他这样做了。好伟大，真的好伟大。
另外一个情节也是感人至深，门罗的小女儿爱丽丝被豪克依的哥哥雍加爱慕，但她被休伦族的激进者马瓜胁迫，雍加去救爱丽丝却被马瓜杀死并从悬崖坠下，这时惊人的，在剧中一直羸弱的爱丽丝见此情景，居然自己毅然的跳入崖下。那份弱女子的勇敢和坚定让人敬佩不以。
你可以说这是一部战争片，在我心里，它也讲述了人性，爱，自由。
很好看的电影，推荐。
2 ) 美洲原住民的血礼史，虚伪双标的盎格鲁撒克逊后裔们的杰作！！！！
自从白人殖民者脚步踏上美洲大陆，注定给印地安原住民带来灭顶之灾！从荷兰人到西班牙人，再到英国人法国人，最后美国人，印地安人血与泪的灭族史，美国人通过毛皮交换将天花带给印地安族，美国首任总统华盛顿鼓励对印地安种族灭绝式屠杀，印地安族被屠2500万人，从美洲最多原住民灭绝至今最少种族，这些都是虚伪双标的盎格鲁撒克逊后裔们的杰作！！！！
3 ) 老师给的资料
Michael Mann (b. 1943)
Like Bruce Beresford, Michael Mann might claim to be slightly other than the “typical” Hollyoood director, though he is Chicago-born and works a little more comfortably within American genres and conventions. But his apprenticeship includes a B.A. in literature from University of Wisconsin and a film degree from the prestigious London Film School. Returning to the USA in the1970s, he moved smoothly into commercial advertising where, like Ridley (Blade Runner) Scott, he quickly claimed distinction for his remarkable sense of lighting and décor. By the early 1980s he had segued off into television, gaining fame as the executive producer of a popular and long-running investigative crime drama, Miami Vice. The series established the city of Miami as the new site of “film noir” and its impact on the industry is still visible in contemporary shows like Miami CSI and The Glades. Lots of neon, lots of light on water, lots of with-it music.
Frequently, directors who gravitate towards television sink below the horizon and are never heard from again. Mann was spared this fate because his skills-set fit nicely with the popular neo-noir revival of the 1980s and 1990s, to which he contributed Manhunter (1983). LA Takedown (1986) and Heat (1995), and The Insider (1999). In the new millennium Mann would add Miami Vice (2006) and Public Enemies (2009) to his screen credits: the first is a film vaguely evolved from the television series of the 1980s and the second a reprise of the 1930s gangster film, built around the figure of John Dillinger. It has never done any harm to Mann’s career that he is also a capable screenwriter and a competent business manager with a knack for collecting first-class theatrical talent (think, Al Pacino, Robert DeNiro, and Russell Crowe, among others). Though his proven achievements would seem to best suit him for films with contemporary, urban settings and accents of the thriller, it didn’t surprise too many people when he was contracted to direct The Last of the Mohicans (1992), the sixth remake of James Fenimore Cooper’s novel of the same name, the favorite narrative of “Leather-Stocking Tales,” which founded the western genre in the 1820s.
As in Black Robe, we have in Last of the Mohicans a narrative of the earlier American west, when the “frontier” began on the northwest outskirts of New York City. We are now slightly more than 100 years downstream from the period of the Jesuit chronicles, but the war we are plunged into is the same world-historical battle between the empires of France and Britain for the control of North America. Now in its final phase, a seven-year encounter which in the USA is called the French/Indian War (1756-63), this protracted battle leaves Britain the master of the continent, but also brings to the world stage a new set of actors who are beginning to call themselves “Americans,” and even remarking, quietly and hesitantly still, that they might prefer not to be servants of the English crown. The tribal tensions remain much the same: the Indians south of Lake Ontario (the Iroquois and the Mohicans) are allied with the English; the Algonquins and the Hurons, both north of the lake, take their marching orders from the French. A little incongruously, the Mohicans are tribal kin of the Algonquins, as indicated by their language, and bear no great love for the Iroquois. But the Iroquois Confederacy, the most powerful Native American political force of New York and New England, pursued a policy of “assimilation,” which forcibly drew members of other tribes into their own, sometimes effectively erasing the tribe’s original identity. Hence the dire threat state to the Mohicans, which gives Cooper the title of his novel.
Fenimore Cooper, of course, is much more invested in these historical events than Michael Mann. The creator of “Leather Stocking” belongs to the first generation of post-revolution Americans: he was born in 1789, virtually at the outset of Washington’s first term as President. And one of the crucial events of Cooper’s teenage years was the journey of Lewis and Clark up the Missouri river to map the land acquired in the Louisiana Purchase. More to the point, perhaps, is that he was growing up during the second war with Britain (1812-14), in which the USA had decisively defeated English forces in the west. A decade later, just three years before the publication of Cooper’s novel, President Monroe sent to Congress a message known as the Monroe Doctrine, which decisively asserts the claims of American nationalism against all the European powers. Cooper writes out of this intensely nationalistic milieu, but is aware of some of its complexity, working very self-consciously with issues of race and ethnicity. What place, if any, do the native peoples have in the new nation? How have they contributed to the creation of a unique American sensibility? How do we gracefully invite them to leave the land to us? As you will see in our small excerpt from the novel, Cooper struggles with these questions, finding them a bit awkward.
Mann is far less interested in American history and operates at a much lower level of political fervor. You might notice, for example, that Nathaniel, the archetypal American, turns out to be the British actor Daniel Day Lewis, who manages somehow to look pretty authentic in the costume of a backwoodsman. Mann handles the Native Americans differently as well, nodding appreciatively towards their value system but excluding them from real relevance. Interestingly, the film was released in the same year that marked the 500th anniversary of Columbus’ first voyage, which caused it to be charged in some circles with “cultural imperialism.” That’s a matter we will almost certainly discuss in class. What also seems reasonably certain is that Mann tries strenuously to reduce the political concerns of the novel and replace them with a love story. But as with other purveyors of western myth, the love story has an added dimension. We are really being invited to fall in love with the American west.
Like Bruce Beresford, Michael Mann might claim to be slightly other than the “typical” Hollyoood director, though he is Chicago-born and works a little more comfortably within American genres and conventions. But his apprenticeship includes a B.A. in literature from University of Wisconsin and a film degree from the prestigious London Film School. Returning to the USA in the1970s, he moved smoothly into commercial advertising where, like Ridley (Blade Runner) Scott, he quickly claimed distinction for his remarkable sense of lighting and décor. By the early 1980s he had segued off into television, gaining fame as the executive producer of a popular and long-running investigative crime drama, Miami Vice. The series established the city of Miami as the new site of “film noir” and its impact on the industry is still visible in contemporary shows like Miami CSI and The Glades. Lots of neon, lots of light on water, lots of with-it music.
Frequently, directors who gravitate towards television sink below the horizon and are never heard from again. Mann was spared this fate because his skills-set fit nicely with the popular neo-noir revival of the 1980s and 1990s, to which he contributed Manhunter (1983). LA Takedown (1986) and Heat (1995), and The Insider (1999). In the new millennium Mann would add Miami Vice (2006) and Public Enemies (2009) to his screen credits: the first is a film vaguely evolved from the television series of the 1980s and the second a reprise of the 1930s gangster film, built around the figure of John Dillinger. It has never done any harm to Mann’s career that he is also a capable screenwriter and a competent business manager with a knack for collecting first-class theatrical talent (think, Al Pacino, Robert DeNiro, and Russell Crowe, among others). Though his proven achievements would seem to best suit him for films with contemporary, urban settings and accents of the thriller, it didn’t surprise too many people when he was contracted to direct The Last of the Mohicans (1992), the sixth remake of James Fenimore Cooper’s novel of the same name, the favorite narrative of “Leather-Stocking Tales,” which founded the western genre in the 1820s.
As in Black Robe, we have in Last of the Mohicans a narrative of the earlier American west, when the “frontier” began on the northwest outskirts of New York City. We are now slightly more than 100 years downstream from the period of the Jesuit chronicles, but the war we are plunged into is the same world-historical battle between the empires of France and Britain for the control of North America. Now in its final phase, a seven-year encounter which in the USA is called the French/Indian War (1756-63), this protracted battle leaves Britain the master of the continent, but also brings to the world stage a new set of actors who are beginning to call themselves “Americans,” and even remarking, quietly and hesitantly still, that they might prefer not to be servants of the English crown. The tribal tensions remain much the same: the Indians south of Lake Ontario (the Iroquois and the Mohicans) are allied with the English; the Algonquins and the Hurons, both north of the lake, take their marching orders from the French. A little incongruously, the Mohicans are tribal kin of the Algonquins, as indicated by their language, and bear no great love for the Iroquois. But the Iroquois Confederacy, the most powerful Native American political force of New York and New England, pursued a policy of “assimilation,” which forcibly drew members of other tribes into their own, sometimes effectively erasing the tribe’s original identity. Hence the dire threat state to the Mohicans, which gives Cooper the title of his novel.
Fenimore Cooper, of course, is much more invested in these historical events than Michael Mann. The creator of “Leather Stocking” belongs to the first generation of post-revolution Americans: he was born in 1789, virtually at the outset of Washington’s first term as President. And one of the crucial events of Cooper’s teenage years was the journey of Lewis and Clark up the Missouri river to map the land acquired in the Louisiana Purchase. More to the point, perhaps, is that he was growing up during the second war with Britain (1812-14), in which the USA had decisively defeated English forces in the west. A decade later, just three years before the publication of Cooper’s novel, President Monroe sent to Congress a message known as the Monroe Doctrine, which decisively asserts the claims of American nationalism against all the European powers. Cooper writes out of this intensely nationalistic milieu, but is aware of some of its complexity, working very self-consciously with issues of race and ethnicity. What place, if any, do the native peoples have in the new nation? How have they contributed to the creation of a unique American sensibility? How do we gracefully invite them to leave the land to us? As you will see in our small excerpt from the novel, Cooper struggles with these questions, finding them a bit awkward.
Mann is far less interested in American history and operates at a much lower level of political fervor. You might notice, for example, that Nathaniel, the archetypal American, turns out to be the British actor Daniel Day Lewis, who manages somehow to look pretty authentic in the costume of a backwoodsman. Mann handles the Native Americans differently as well, nodding appreciatively towards their value system but excluding them from real relevance. Interestingly, the film was released in the same year that marked the 500th anniversary of Columbus’ first voyage, which caused it to be charged in some circles with “cultural imperialism.” That’s a matter we will almost certainly discuss in class. What also seems reasonably certain is that Mann tries strenuously to reduce the political concerns of the novel and replace them with a love story. But as with other purveyors of western myth, the love story has an added dimension. We are really being invited to fall in love with the American west.
4 ) 北美殖民地的一部史诗--《最后的莫西干人》
我最近一段时间在认真的研读美国历史，这是我在日本史和苏联史、罗马史之外又一个重点研读的方向，在看到英法七年战争这段历史背景的时候得到介绍看了这部电影《最后的莫西干人》，这本书，我在书店的书架上看了好久，一直无缘拜读，先看了一下这部电影。电影的开篇我就非常喜欢，音乐紧紧的抓住了我，那雄壮的北美山脉配合着一首豪迈悲怆的音乐，这首旋律足以媲美《勇敢的心》那苏格兰风笛的美妙演奏。
电影讲述了印第安人中莫西干部落最后几位勇士营救两位英国将军被俘虏的女儿的故事，在这条主线之外，我们看到的是英法以及与当地印第安部落之间的复杂历史关系，这里面有着文明冲突的伤痛，几位莫西干勇士是白人化了的印第安人，这也是唱给印第安文明的一首悲情挽歌，电影的最后，最后的老莫西干勇士感慨，莫西干部落、印第安民族都将消失，白人会更多的到来，这里会有崭新的国家，崭新的民族在这块土地上耕耘，但是无可否认的是，我们也曾经在历史上在这块土地上存在过。
文明的进程不是温情脉脉的，有着历史的阵痛，那个悲情的印第安民族也是一个崇尚英雄与自然和谐相处的一种存在，他们的确曾经存在。
5 ) 《最后的莫希干人》
<图片1>
所有的战争都是为了满足少部分人的贪欲 什么为了土地 国家 自由 还有那个的荣誉而成为他们的欲望工具。你只要保护好你要保护的东西就好了，如果要打仗 为什么发起打仗的人不自行解决，如果为了自由？可我们本来就身在囚禁之下，什么最重要？如果生命和金钱放在你面前，所有每个个体都会选生命，但是国家会选择金钱
所有的战争都是为了满足少部分人的贪欲 什么为了土地 国家 自由 还有那个的荣誉而成为他们的欲望工具。你只要保护好你要保护的东西就好了，如果要打仗 为什么发起打仗的人不自行解决，如果为了自由？可我们本来就身在囚禁之下，什么最重要？如果生命和金钱放在你面前，所有每个个体都会选生命，但是国家会选择金钱
6 ) 战争史诗的幌子，平庸爱情的里子。
电影一开场是印第安人土著在丛林间狩猎，猎物倒地，印第安人虔诚地为其哀悼。电影结束时是金卡加以莫希干族最后战士的身份悼念死去的儿子，“伟大的圣灵和创造生命的主，一位战士就像射入烈日的箭，射向您了，欢迎他吧…”但是印第安人土著与英法殖民者的矛盾、“文明”与“野蛮”的矛盾、生命与自然的敬畏、战争的惨烈都不是电影所表现的主题，电影只是搭建了一个1757年北美英法殖民战争的舞台，用以烘托白裔土著与殖民军官千金之间英雄救美、美人倾心的普通爱情故事罢了。
电影在前半段铺设背景时大气磅礴，一场信仰与生命的史诗革命仿佛即将开始，英法殖民者在印第安人土著的家园之上开战厮杀、称雄割据，各土著族群也以自愿或被哄骗的方式各为其主，以雇佣民兵的身份相互厮杀。被殖民者印第安土著个人家族的生死与殖民者英法帝国的利益之间是永远无法弥合的文明伤痕，英国殖民者与法国殖民者之间战火纷飞、你死我亡。英勇矫健的主角霍克依出场宛如印第安人的英雄，一句“我们不是你们的殖民，自然也不是你们的民兵”似乎也是反抗斗争的前兆，身为白种人却是被印第安人以土著方式收养大的经历更是曾加了一层身份认同的戏剧悲歌，但是电影让霍克依完成的使命却只是保护殖民军官女儿们的安全！炮火轰天的战斗也随着英法两方简单客套的谈判礼仪戛然而止！
电影与其叫“最后的莫希干人”，不如叫“可娜与爱丽丝的美洲爱情之旅”。电影中的两个莫希干人——金卡加和儿子欧卡斯出场、对白寥寥，不过是两个跟着霍克依的帮手角色。至于主线，电影的前半段剧情是如何安全护送可娜和爱丽丝两位小姐到她们父亲处，后半段剧情是如何保证可娜和爱丽丝两位小姐安全逃脱马瓜坏人的魔掌。
霍克依与可娜两人一见钟情、二见倾心，简单的暧昧过后就到了一吻情深、生死不离的地步，可以说是简单直接、热烈似火，但两人的相处似乎缺少了细节铺垫与刻画，恋情显得模糊而随意。其次，两人的恋情的阻碍只是简单的外在冲突，更多的是时间匆忙、无法相守，两个人似乎一直处在奔走逃离的状况中，两个主角内心情绪刻画的缺乏使得这份感情浮于表面，无法直抵人心。外在战争与生死的动荡没有内化为内心情感的激荡，也就无法让人印象深刻。
战争年代的旷世奇恋并不是不存在，以爱情作为电影的主要基调并不是不能创作出优秀的电影，只是这部电影的爱情过分简单平庸，细节刻画让位给了战争，最终导致的结果是战争不深刻、爱情不动人，不伦不类，失望乏味。最初的电影是3个小时，但福克斯要求导演把电影剪短至2个小时，其中消失的部分不知道可不可以弥补现在的遗憾。
今天《最后的莫西干人》，依然是因为配乐而看，Trevor Jones不愧汉斯大湿最得意门生，整张配乐一牛到底，大气磅礴总要缠绵悱恻来点缀，丹尼尔·戴-刘易斯简直型爆了，几乎算我最爱的男演员了，罡气如《我的左脚》，《以父之名》，文艺有《布拉格之恋》，《纯真年代》，霸气可《血色将至》，《纽约黑帮
看着片名以为是个恢弘悲壮的少数裔斗争故事，谁知道他喵的竟然是两白人莫名其妙的爱情故事，然后还害死一对苦命鸳鸯，所以才导致最后只剩一个莫西干人了，如此才点题，这简直是挂羊头卖狗肉吧。。。╮(╯▽╰)╭PS：当然那广为流传的配乐的确是赞。
08年11月27瑰丽雄奇，堪比Cooper原著。配乐简直...
很好的素材，很悲壮的故事，和原本应该很严肃的主题。爱情被放大太多了，以至于片名“最后一个莫西干人”这个最重要的主题被忽视了。前半段节奏很奇怪，总体还算是紧凑。值得一提的是，原声，演员，场面都非常出色。刘易斯太潇洒了。
我對Daniel Day-Lewis的印象，僅止于他配角的A room with a view，可是此片裏，他的個人魅力太強了，幾個眼神相信無數女觀衆就被俘虜
Action/Sci-Fi/Thriller/Suspence/Crime Drama
"You stay alive, no matter what occurs! I will fing you! No matter how long it takes, no matter how far! I will find you!.." The world’s on fire. It's so nice to see you.
主题曲一响起就感到悲从中来，恢宏壮阔如苍鹰翱翔在广袤的群山之巅。喜欢这部电影，故事也讲得很不错，但对于整部电影呈现出来的历史态度还是感到难过，白人与印第安人在这里相互厮杀，势均力敌，白人对印第安人的屠戮往往以言语回忆交代，而印第安人的报复却直观呈现……尽管对于历史时代中的个体，也许不必刻意褒贬，更何况这个世界没有一寸人类可及之地，没有被罪恶和杀戮洗礼过。
气势磅礴的配乐很美，长发飘飘的刘易斯很帅，几场正面近身遭遇站还是有迈克尔·曼的风采，以上就是本片的全部优点。
音乐很有气势，不过剧情实在是一般。放在九二年看，应该是杰作，只可惜现在是看惯了各种各样类型大制作的2008年……总是感觉在里面能找到这部那部电影的影子，实际上应该是那些电影在一定程度上模仿它，但，还是怪我看它的时间不凑巧吧……不过话说回来，丹尼尔戴刘易斯在里面还真是有型啊~夕阳下他微笑着说的那声“You”，敢问哪个女人的心不会因此而融化啊……
这片子完全是靠配乐，美景和奔跑的刘易斯撑起来的，剧情完全可以忽略。最后被妹子的殉情给感动了，多给一颗星。迈克曼比较适合导双雄戏，只要爱情占了主要地位那片子必定杯具
【A－】迈克尔·曼绝不仅仅只是擅长拍夜戏的导演，在本片里他所更加注重的是「暗」，哪怕是烈日凌空的戏，迈克尔·曼都会执着于在镜头下创造暗部。可以认为他的影像本质就是光与暗的较量，以及角色在阴影间穿梭所留下的姿态，所以才会有如此多的追逐戏，在慢节奏的叙事下仍然迷恋这种原始的肢体呈现，最终的摄影效果便是人物与景观的和谐。大量的战争戏与动作戏保持较高水准，林中遇袭那场戏调度最为亮眼，迈克尔·曼甚至用一个可怕的长镜头来展现他对大量群演的调度能力。最后悬崖上的决战，其剪辑本质是与《大盗独行》完全一致的，直接拔高了我的观感。当然不得不承认，Trevor Jones的配乐绝对是超越迈克尔·曼影像的存在。
电影名字就够悲壮，配上音乐简直了。最后那场谈判还挺让人感动的...丹尼尔戴刘易斯真是帅啊，飘逸的长发，健壮的身躯，奔跑的步伐，温柔的眼神~~~
与世无争宛若生活在油画上伊甸园里《最后的莫希干人》是早期殖民主义时代所谓人类文明最后的保护神，然而一场不属于却来自于异化的野蛮人播下的战火将土地上仅有的家园焚毁成了废墟。大而俗的爱在电影中是轰轰烈烈的精神信仰，亦是死灰复燃重建社会秩序的希望。银幕之外它是按照以上模式再演绎无数遍。
20年前92年的老片了，现在看来还是不错的，依然是战争史诗背景下的爱情故事的套路，不过还算讲的流畅，只是男主角成了个莫希干化了的白种人，有点减弱力度，可能是为了票房的原因。配乐豪迈悲怆，非常值得一听，OST可以找来欣赏。
Daniel Day Lewis在片中不断奔跑的镜头酷毙了
接近俩小时的电影不知道导演想表达什么或者说想表达的太多，历史，爱情，还是对四位莫西干人的赞美?结果哪一样也没有表达好。剧情之间衔接不到位，各种突兀不合理，就不一一列举了，最雷人的是小女儿竟然就那么殉情了，他们俩之间到底发生了什么???还有就是那段配乐，各种用，哪里都能用...
在内容和外观上，电影都让人仿佛看到了《勇敢的心》的影子，但它却讲了一个无法令人产生共鸣的爱情故事。导演没有能够赋予电影以灵魂，使得不错的画面沦为了街边无法记住的橱窗布置。它给人的最深印象应该是，丹尼尔·戴·刘易斯年轻时这么帅，和电影的音响效果是真的特别棒。
合着你们殖民有理，印第安人给驱逐屠戮殆尽你们也没辙，只是物尽天择丛林法则起作用？最后还找人印第安老头给你殖民辩护找合理依据，“这片土地只适合我的白人孩子与她的女人……一代代人将在这里奋斗，但是，我们毕竟在这里生活过。”没你们这样的，侵略了人，还讲便宜话，真行。
2小时，除了大气磅礴的音乐，还可以看到不同的人对于战斗荣誉和仇恨不同的理解认识以及由此产生的不同行为。人类的历史是血腥而残忍的，只有相信和坚持某一些东西，才能使人变得更像个人，而不是最聪明的禽兽。