You know the problem with Hollywood? They make shit. Unbelievable, unremarkable shit. I'm not some wannabe filmmaker... ...searching for existentialism through a haze of bong smoke. No, it's easy to pick apart bad acting, shortsighted directing... ...and a moronic stringing together of words the studios term as prose. No, I'm talking about the lack of realism. Realism. Not a pervasive element in modern American cinematic vision. Take Dog Day Afternoon, for example. Arguably Pacino's best work. Short of Scarface and Godfather Part I, of course. Masterpiece of directing, easily Lumet's best. The cinematography, the acting, the screenplay, all topnotch. But... ...they didn't push the envelope. What if, in Dog Day Sonny wanted to get away with it? Really wanted that. Now this is the tricky part. What if he started killing hostages right away? No mercy, no quarter. "Meet our demands or the pretty blond gets it in the head." Bam, splat. What, still no bus? Come on. How many innocent victims would it take for the city... ...to reverse its policy on hostages? And this is 1976. There's no CNN. There's no CNBC. There's no Internet. Fast-forward to today. Present time, same situation. How quickly would the media make a frenzy? In hours. It would be the biggest story from Boston to Budapest. Ten hostages die. Twenty, thirty. Relentless. Bam, bim. One after another. All on hi-def, computer-enhanced. You can almost taste the brain matter. All for what? A bus, a plane? A couple million dollars that's federally insured? I don't think so, but... ...just a thought. I mean, it's not... ...within the realm of conventional cinema, but... ...what if? - There's a problem with that movie. - Really? - It wouldn't work. - How come? - Audiences love happy endings. - Pacino escapes with the money. Boyfriend gets a sex change. Live happily ever after. - No? - No. Homophobia. Bad guy can't win. It's a morality tale. One way or the other, he's gotta go down. Well, life is stranger than fiction sometimes. You know, guys, I gotta go. Gotta jet. Thanks for the coffee.
枪战动作火爆侵入爆窃惊险。情节还算不错。评论很多集中在哈莉如何如何性感上,我倒觉得还不如在007中的扮相来得迷人。
金刚狼并不适合演黑客
只记得咬的镜头了。
特拉沃塔总是演这种高智商犯罪的人物
约 JohnTravolta 还是很有演技的
1.这种劲爆十足、牛逼屌屌的开头实在太酷炫了;2.这种皆大欢喜的happy ending真是太合我胃口了;3.如此具有魅力指数值的坏蛋才是我喜闻乐见的,一改过往对电影里终极boss总是很蠢的刻板印象。
开头拍的巨好,从哈利贝瑞出场开始有点掉链子,最后还是被Travolta邪到崩溃的演技和Jackman骚到逆天的肉体拯救了。电影非常炫酷非常快很准,故事切入点也蛮有料,摒弃道德标杆来看大阴谋的设置也很过瘾,但看完有种不知在哪里缺了一口气的感觉。
黑珍珠这部电影完全没意义,还露点了,真不知道她咋想的
口交那段记忆犹新
其实这部经典动作片如果对影片所要探讨的话题的戏份更多一点会更好。PS:程序员终究都是高智商低情商。
休杰克曼的那段即兴编程,还有亮点的开场的360°环形爆裂,还有约翰特拉沃尔塔的坚毅与残忍,哈利贝瑞放荡不羁的全裸,以及那段BJ,都是亮点。飞机,吊车,导弹,轮船,美国人拍片子不把钱当回事。不失为一部好看的动作片,就是逻辑有点扯蛋,或者说结果为了呼应不一样的故事结尾,障眼法故弄玄虚
“多屏幕系统”太搞笑了
印象深刻的是那句:如果消灭所有疾病的代价是杀死一个无辜的小女孩,你会做吗?
介于三位后来大红大紫的演员的强势出演,其实这部片子还是有能力挑战类型片的天花板的。但是事实上也就是平平。故事上还显幼稚,但毕竟类型片的发展其实也很快。演技上的话哈利贝瑞当时还不行,太嫩
障眼法!!!人们会相信亲眼目睹的事情,然而即使亲眼目睹了也未必是真的。(顺便说下现在这个跟风的流量年代,人们没有亲眼目睹都会相信,真是够倒退的)哈莉贝瑞负责放福利。就是结尾太草草了事了,声名狼藉的恐怖分子无故爆炸直接一笔带过了……反派刻画比正派还好这点很棒,杀死所有疾病的代价是杀死一个无辜的善良的小女孩,你会做吗?
反英雄片,哈利的tits。。。。。。。。。。。。。黑客看起来好diao但实际上各种夸大
那时候金刚狼还没有长出一脸的连毛胡子,哈利贝瑞正点得鼻血直流,可是约翰特拉沃塔已经让人不忍心直视了。。。。
有许多惊艳的镜头和场景设计,比如头尾呼应的环绕爆炸镜头、狼叔的编程、飞机吊巴士等。虽然有些玩小聪明的做作感,至少弥补了故事的不合逻辑,比如黑珍珠的角色到底是在干嘛的?搞不懂。导演很明显在讨论以暴制暴的合理性,最后的结局说明他赞同,且片中多处讽刺政府和警察的无能,有点意思
十分刻意地做出来的颠覆感,没劲;不过哈里·贝瑞的露点还是比较爽的~~
这是冷硬犯罪嘛..最喜欢的好莱坞动作片之一.黑客像弹钢琴,也是一门艺术.反派胜利,这是五星的关键点